Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Right Baits the Left to Turn Against Hillary Clinton [View all]NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)36. Link, please?
I've Googled, and can't find anything about that.
I certainly stand to be corrected, if you have the info.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
119 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Anti-Hillary folks don't care where the source comes from as long as it bashes Hillary.
leftofcool
Jun 2015
#1
YOU ARE CORRECT SIR, look at the date of this article.... Not exactly LBN, and I know it GD but...
winstars
Jun 2015
#9
This must be a talking point, I've seen it several times now, the 'left' is so stupid they
sabrina 1
Jun 2015
#47
'at colleges and universities'. What about other speeches? Do colleges and universities pay
sabrina 1
Jun 2015
#48
I'm fascinated by the absurd claim that the Clintons gave their entire income to charity!
delrem
Jun 2015
#56
Actually they didn't according to what I read. The amount they gave to charity
sabrina 1
Jun 2015
#61
For ordinary people that is true. But if we had a Charitable Foundation and the 'income' went
sabrina 1
Jun 2015
#65
'People' are not paying for these speeches. People don't have between $190,000 - $250,000
sabrina 1
Jun 2015
#66
I noticed that tactic too. It must been in one of the memos that go out. Not a good idea all have
sabrina 1
Jun 2015
#96
So you also claim that the Clintons give all payments from speaking fees to charity?
delrem
Jun 2015
#75
It is "innuendo" to say that personal income isn't the same thing as "charity"?
delrem
Jun 2015
#117
NanceGreggs: "yes, it is my understanding that Hillary has donated all of her speaking fees to char
delrem
Jun 2015
#78
That's right. Her speaking fees were private income. Not "charity", as you claimed.
delrem
Jun 2015
#106
The IRS doesn't "go after" people who don't donate ALL their income from fees to charity!
delrem
Jun 2015
#114
jeez, people don't pay the Clintons that much to speak, just to "get a gov't job"
delrem
Jun 2015
#86
I see. It isn't "direct", even tho' it goes straight into the politician's personal cash.
delrem
Jun 2015
#95
I'd like to point out that the "fringe left" you call is actually mainstream Democrats
Jumpin Jack Flash
Jun 2015
#28
No, it doesn't. Isn't it just peachy keen WONDERFUL that most people don't care about politics?
eridani
Jun 2015
#58
Exactly what Hillary does. Associates every criticism, true or false, with the right.
merrily
Jun 2015
#53
Why do we need to lend assistance to the RW? It is some of the same talking points.
Thinkingabout
Jun 2015
#27
