Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Right Baits the Left to Turn Against Hillary Clinton [View all]NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)49. In other words ...
... you couldn't find a single link proving that HRC pockets the money from her speaking fees, and doesn't donate the money to charity.
LOUD and CLEAR, my friend. Loud and clear.
YOU are the one who claimed her speaking fees were "take-home" income - so where are YOUR links?
Apparently, you don't have any.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
119 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Anti-Hillary folks don't care where the source comes from as long as it bashes Hillary.
leftofcool
Jun 2015
#1
YOU ARE CORRECT SIR, look at the date of this article.... Not exactly LBN, and I know it GD but...
winstars
Jun 2015
#9
This must be a talking point, I've seen it several times now, the 'left' is so stupid they
sabrina 1
Jun 2015
#47
'at colleges and universities'. What about other speeches? Do colleges and universities pay
sabrina 1
Jun 2015
#48
I'm fascinated by the absurd claim that the Clintons gave their entire income to charity!
delrem
Jun 2015
#56
Actually they didn't according to what I read. The amount they gave to charity
sabrina 1
Jun 2015
#61
For ordinary people that is true. But if we had a Charitable Foundation and the 'income' went
sabrina 1
Jun 2015
#65
'People' are not paying for these speeches. People don't have between $190,000 - $250,000
sabrina 1
Jun 2015
#66
I noticed that tactic too. It must been in one of the memos that go out. Not a good idea all have
sabrina 1
Jun 2015
#96
So you also claim that the Clintons give all payments from speaking fees to charity?
delrem
Jun 2015
#75
It is "innuendo" to say that personal income isn't the same thing as "charity"?
delrem
Jun 2015
#117
NanceGreggs: "yes, it is my understanding that Hillary has donated all of her speaking fees to char
delrem
Jun 2015
#78
That's right. Her speaking fees were private income. Not "charity", as you claimed.
delrem
Jun 2015
#106
The IRS doesn't "go after" people who don't donate ALL their income from fees to charity!
delrem
Jun 2015
#114
jeez, people don't pay the Clintons that much to speak, just to "get a gov't job"
delrem
Jun 2015
#86
I see. It isn't "direct", even tho' it goes straight into the politician's personal cash.
delrem
Jun 2015
#95
I'd like to point out that the "fringe left" you call is actually mainstream Democrats
Jumpin Jack Flash
Jun 2015
#28
No, it doesn't. Isn't it just peachy keen WONDERFUL that most people don't care about politics?
eridani
Jun 2015
#58
Exactly what Hillary does. Associates every criticism, true or false, with the right.
merrily
Jun 2015
#53
Why do we need to lend assistance to the RW? It is some of the same talking points.
Thinkingabout
Jun 2015
#27
