Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Breaking: FT & $700 M cuts to Medicare in exchange for "promise" to remove MC cuts later? [View all]daredtowork
(3,732 posts)44. Re: Looting the Social Security Trust Fund
And today the GOP is looking into Chained CPI and calling SSI stealth welfare to slime out of paying that back.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Breaking: FT & $700 M cuts to Medicare in exchange for "promise" to remove MC cuts later? [View all]
Faryn Balyncd
Jun 2015
OP
It's beyond willful stupidity. I don't buy them being that ignorant, or stupid.
onecaliberal
Jun 2015
#10
So do you suggest waiting to hear from the talking heads on the Friday night "news"?
Faryn Balyncd
Jun 2015
#6
I have no doubt the $700 million would be cut. I have PLENTY of doubt it would ever be restored.
Buns_of_Fire
Jun 2015
#9
Bingo: If it's supposed to CREATE jobs, why have a provision for displaced workers?
erronis
Jun 2015
#13
It would never be restored. Yeah, if it's supposed to create jobs why is this provision necessary?
Enthusiast
Jun 2015
#45
This is disgusting. Republicans are going to absolutely use this as the centerpiece
bullwinkle428
Jun 2015
#11
Didin't Dems already fall for something like this concerning welfare reforms under Clinton? nt
kelliekat44
Jun 2015
#14
And the Dems still claim that removing people from aid for housing and child care and putting
LiberalArkie
Jun 2015
#16
Depends on what the meaning of "worked" is. HE was re-elected. HIS WIFE might be elected.
WinkyDink
Jun 2015
#28
I don't remember that as any kind of trade or future-promise; just a flat-out change.
WinkyDink
Jun 2015
#27
Well, that's a shit sandwich. It also suggests Ryan has a higher nosecount than I've heard
Recursion
Jun 2015
#22
We'll read it later, too! And best hold our very opinions, as well, "UNTIL IT'S THE LAAAAAAW!!"
WinkyDink
Jun 2015
#26
What's wrong with these ass wipes? It's time we elect some radical left Democrats.
jalan48
Jun 2015
#24
OMG. It's all hopeless. Fa$$$$t Track is in like Flynn; who's trying to kid whom here?
WinkyDink
Jun 2015
#25