Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

davekriss

(5,362 posts)
37. Why would any American President...
Fri Jun 12, 2015, 12:58 PM
Jun 2015

...never mind a Democratic President who, according to Poltical Compass in 2008, was only slightly right of center, push ANY legislation that "displaces" workers?

We need a government that - minimum - will directly invest and encourage private capital to invest in infrastructure and human capital, not one that pushes policies that benefit the few at the cost of the many.

But then there's that darn Princeton study that points out we do not have a democracy anymore, we live under the rule of the oligarchs and the political class are their servants.

On edit: "...pushes policies that benefit the few...": The policies increase the rate of return on capital by reducing the costs of labor and regulation. Um, the vast majority of us, 99% of us, are in fact "labor" - where did we sign up for a government that is willing to reduces our wages to bolster profit for the 1%? Where did we sign up to have our air polluted, our water besmirched, our medicines kept outrageously expensive, just so the capitalist can accumulate more capital?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Let's hope so... truebrit71 Jun 2015 #1
Now I am trying to brace myself for a ceremonial failure, and then over the weekend or djean111 Jun 2015 #4
You are absolutely correct, and it stinks. Red Oak Jun 2015 #40
Cynical? awoke_in_2003 Jun 2015 #70
yes, you are right... but we can at least appreciate this temporary victory Fast Walker 52 Jun 2015 #45
That's what I'm worried about. SusanCalvin Jun 2015 #68
And Paul Fucking Ryan n/t Oilwellian Jun 2015 #25
Yep, and a few here don't see it awoke_in_2003 Jun 2015 #69
I wish, but I think enough of them are bought and paid for. CharlotteVale Jun 2015 #2
K & R !!! WillyT Jun 2015 #3
greatest president ever. fucking not cali Jun 2015 #5
Jury results B2G Jun 2015 #15
Juror 4 is straight out of one of Orwell's nighmares DisgustipatedinCA Jun 2015 #26
That's how the Soviet Union dealt with dissadents amb123 Jun 2015 #34
The truth about the President shall remain a secret like the trade deal. Enthusiast Jun 2015 #58
The jury system DOES work. Good. ChairmanAgnostic Jun 2015 #27
Do you know the country of origin on that cut of meat? Enthusiast Jun 2015 #60
Nirvana? ChairmanAgnostic Jun 2015 #67
lol, my darling juror #4. Bet you lack the nerve to identify yourself to me. cali Jun 2015 #28
Lol. Don't hold your breath. B2G Jun 2015 #31
thanks, #1 cali Jun 2015 #36
It weren't me!! Hi Cali! Xipe Totec Jun 2015 #49
Juror #4 needs to work on his/her manners. City Lights Jun 2015 #29
Juror #4's post violates DU standards JimDandy Jun 2015 #41
^^ This! nt dorkzilla Jun 2015 #50
I completely agree. I hope someone alerted on it. City Lights Jun 2015 #52
It does! Enthusiast Jun 2015 #61
To me this looks more like a poll and the Vermont Cheddar beats Velveeta 6 to 1 in this taste survey corkhead Jun 2015 #65
Oh, and that is just bullshit to imply that the negative stuff is only about TAA. djean111 Jun 2015 #6
WOW! The arrogance....so sad... TheNutcracker Jun 2015 #7
Yes, the President promoting such an anti-worker anti-climate anti-sovereignty bill Trajan Jun 2015 #53
To oppose TAA now is to kill the program permanently. Republicans will never allow it pass under tritsofme Jun 2015 #8
+1 YoungDemCA Jun 2015 #10
how effective has it been? cali Jun 2015 #20
Most progressive Dems and liberal economists oppose TPP. lark Jun 2015 #42
Well, TAA failed under NAFTA, failed under CAFTA, failed under other trade deals jeff47 Jun 2015 #44
Aren't they wanting to take Medicare money to fund TAA newfie11 Jun 2015 #9
That was the plan according to what I read yesterday. Divernan Jun 2015 #33
That was my understanding too. Liberalynn Jun 2015 #39
Yes. The Republicans put in that poison pill and then passed it in the Senate. jeff47 Jun 2015 #46
DeFazio was on my TV and it sounded like it has nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #11
For the record- ruffburr Jun 2015 #12
"do not understand exactly what is on his mind" awoke_in_2003 Jun 2015 #71
I both emailed and called the WH and my rep. NO TPA NO TPP. No rip off of medicaid/medicare. jwirr Jun 2015 #13
Sounds to me like madokie Jun 2015 #14
Whoa! Multi-dimensional chess pscot Jun 2015 #18
You're funny madokie Jun 2015 #19
Something here makes no sense..he goes there as a last ditched effort but will not answer Jefferson23 Jun 2015 #16
TAA is them admitting there WILL be job losses Populist_Prole Jun 2015 #17
my sentiments exactly! Fast Walker 52 Jun 2015 #47
Populist_Prole - you are absolutely correct. Red Oak Jun 2015 #57
Whatever it takes...nt City Lights Jun 2015 #21
Question - why is the TAA even necessary, if the TPP is so absolutely super-duper bullwinkle428 Jun 2015 #22
Excellent question! Shemp Howard Jun 2015 #43
yep! exactly! Fast Walker 52 Jun 2015 #48
Quit asking good questions. It annoys some people on this site apparently. RufusTFirefly Jun 2015 #51
Such a GREAT question! Red Oak Jun 2015 #59
I think Boners endorsement might help sink it too. B Calm Jun 2015 #23
People don't want "money doled out to people"...they want jobs that pay a living wage CanonRay Jun 2015 #24
Good. nt silvershadow Jun 2015 #30
Opposition to Fast Track is more complicated than just opposing the trade deals Jack Rabbit Jun 2015 #32
We don't want the assistance. We'll take it if we have to, but we want jobs . . . Ed Suspicious Jun 2015 #35
Why would any American President... davekriss Jun 2015 #37
More presidential assholery - not a good look. polichick Jun 2015 #38
Feels like another desperate act to me. salib Jun 2015 #54
Good. forest444 Jun 2015 #55
Worse than that........................ Enthusiast Jun 2015 #62
My sentiments exactly forest444 Jun 2015 #63
I just do not know. Enthusiast Jun 2015 #64
See "Confessions of an Economic Hitman" davekriss Jun 2015 #66
Would you describe that approach as aloof? Capt. Obvious Jun 2015 #56
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama's Last-Minute Trade...»Reply #37