Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Velveteen Ocelot

(130,667 posts)
5. One could argue, if one were a religious person,
Sat Jun 13, 2015, 11:53 AM
Jun 2015

that it is indeed the Pope's "job" to urge the world to act on climate change "as a moral imperative." It will be interesting to see whether this encyclical is issued as "infallible" (many of them are not designated as such).

Vatican I’s decree “Eternal Pastor” taught: “The Roman Pontiff, when he speaks ex cathedra, that is, when discharging the office of pastor and teacher of all Christians, and defines with his supreme apostolic authority a doctrine concerning faith or morals that is to be held by the universal Church, through the divine assistance promised him in St. Peter, exercises that infallibility which the divine Redeemer wishes to endow his Church for defining doctrine concerning faith or morals.”

Infallibility is a guarantee that neither the pope teaching individually as the Church’s supreme pastor nor the pope teaching in communion with the whole college of bishops can mislead the faithful on an issue essential to salvation.

Encylicals remain very important teaching documents. No pope since 1870 has designated an encyclical as an exercise of papal infallibility, which requires three conditions: 1) the subject is a matter of faith or morals, 2) the pope must be teaching as supreme pastor, and 3) the pope must indicate that the teaching is infallible.

http://www.stanthonymessenger.org/AskAFranciscan/Question.aspx?Question=176

I know very little about Catholic theology, so I have no idea whether the Pope would consider the need to act on climate change to be a crucial issue "concerning faith or morals," but if he believes climate change is likely to cause great suffering and destruction, and if failing to act on it would violate God's directive to care for the earth, maybe he will go all infallible. I would, if I were the Pope. And wouldn't that put the GOPers in a pickle?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

One group of peoplke with a timber factory in their eyes Betty Karlson Jun 2015 #1
It must be so hard being a hypocrit. I remember when Santorum was running for president politicaljunkie41910 Jun 2015 #18
Inhofe is no supporter of the No Establishment Clause betterdemsonly Jun 2015 #19
What exactly is the republican job. onecaliberal Jun 2015 #2
This attitude is rich, coming from them-- truebluegreen Jun 2015 #3
Repubs have been doing a lot of God talking and proseltizing so oops now religious can get political Person 2713 Jun 2015 #4
welcome to du. you are correct. they are hypocrits and will keep screaming. niyad Jun 2015 #11
To be honest... Wounded Bear Jun 2015 #12
One could argue, if one were a religious person, The Velveteen Ocelot Jun 2015 #5
Something tells me attacking the Pope won't work out well for them damnedifIknow Jun 2015 #7
Wonder what they suppose the Pope's job is treestar Jun 2015 #6
Your job? Jesus would throw your asses out of the temple. nt onehandle Jun 2015 #8
Succinctly put. okasha Jun 2015 #17
Your job is getting us elected Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2015 #9
Oh, you Republicans! gratuitous Jun 2015 #10
Fuck all Republicans gopiscrap Jun 2015 #13
reminds me of Michael Novak wagging his finger at JPII and saying His Holiness had to MisterP Jun 2015 #14
Oh haha! But they'd marry him when he condemns abortion Matariki Jun 2015 #15
This would be hilarious if it weren't so dire in its consequences. Coventina Jun 2015 #16
That is just too rich for words... Hekate Jun 2015 #20
Pope promises not to pitch snowball in fit of hysterical ignorance n/t IDemo Jun 2015 #21
Translation: Angry multinational corporations are not pleased. raouldukelives Jun 2015 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Angry US republicans tell...»Reply #5