Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Listening to Hillary's speech today, where have we heard this before? [View all]leveymg
(36,418 posts)43. We are waste deep in mud and going deeper because of the advise of the foreign policy mandarins.
The hawkish foreign policy "professionals" around Hillary have proven themselves wrong over and over again, but never seem to learn from their mistakes. A lot of people are beginning to understand that the TINA doctrine doesn't really apply, and there really are alternatives. Bernie presents an alternative, and he's been right while the neocons and hawks have been very, very wrong.
It's really very simple: fire those who have created the problems, such as ISIS. Hire someone who will do things differently.
We have an opportunity to do better, and to save ourselves a lot of grief in the next 4 to 8 years.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
205 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Listening to Hillary's speech today, where have we heard this before? [View all]
leveymg
Jun 2015
OP
America is overdue for a new direction. The one in which Bernie's moral compass is pointed.
Gregorian
Jun 2015
#2
Thank you, but honestly, I am at the point where I just keep hoping each month
Dragonfli
Jun 2015
#54
Cold-blooded and enjoys showing it. That was my reaction to an earlier remark she made as SoS>
leveymg
Jun 2015
#16
I think that perception is distributed among members of both parties of both genders.
leveymg
Jun 2015
#125
"Men" are not responsible for Hillary's character flaws. The very claim is infantilizing. nt
Romulox
Jun 2015
#170
Lovely. Fan the flames of militarism and address us as if we are fearful cowards.
Luminous Animal
Jun 2015
#15
She is trying to appeal to Republicans. Not a one of them will vote for her.
JDPriestly
Jun 2015
#104
So your recommendation to Bernie Sanders is to ignore foreign policy altogether?
brooklynite
Jun 2015
#18
No, to borrow a phrase (and to contradict Hillary), "Don't do stupid stuff" is a foreign policy.
leveymg
Jun 2015
#19
+1. Obama did change course on Iran, to his credit and I wish Clinton had not
Jefferson23
Jun 2015
#47
I'll take the candidate who doesn't vote to annihilate nations in order to "look tough."
Scootaloo
Jun 2015
#74
I'm pretty sure your education and experience(s) far exceed mine as I'm just a poor working blue
ChisolmTrailDem
Jun 2015
#182
"I’ll do whatever it takes to keep Americans safe" — Yeah, because that's HORRIBLE.
NYC Liberal
Jun 2015
#27
"Great nations need organizing principles - 'Don't do stupid stuff' is not an organizing principle"
leveymg
Jun 2015
#37
The problem is, that phrase means "bear any burden, fight any foe"(graphic image/trigger alert)
Ken Burch
Jun 2015
#51
I've always remembered that, even though he dodged, he never once defended the antiwar movement
Ken Burch
Jun 2015
#197
There are threats!!! Ooooooo...I'm so scared here in the land of the free, home of the brave!! nt
ChisolmTrailDem
Jun 2015
#184
That's what I was thinking she was doing: trying not to look weak; I don't think she was
C Moon
Jun 2015
#52
Yeah, pretty much. I'm not defending what she said, again I think she is trying not to look weak.
C Moon
Jun 2015
#67
Sadly NYC is not home to legal mary jane as of yet, or it might have worked....
peacebird
Jun 2015
#34
ISIS isn't just a problem in the heart of Islam, he is able to get security briefings and if this is
Thinkingabout
Jun 2015
#45
I don't buy this argument. How many times has ISIS attacked in the USA?
DirtyHippyBastard
Jun 2015
#99
We are waste deep in mud and going deeper because of the advise of the foreign policy mandarins.
leveymg
Jun 2015
#43
Fire the ones who created ISIS? yep this would coreect the problem if we could just fire those who
Thinkingabout
Jun 2015
#48
If your answer is reasonable then we could discuss, to be honest with you, firing the ones who
Thinkingabout
Jun 2015
#72
Okay. Let's go back to early 2011 . . . actually one of the ISIS creators was fired. His name was
leveymg
Jun 2015
#76
I merely quoted the NYT, Reuters, Times of London, and you have nothing to say?
leveymg
Jun 2015
#84
Some of them are seeking higher office or, in the alternative, public rehabilitation.
leveymg
Jun 2015
#83
Russia ...the new entree into the axis of evil ...a cold war loving war hawks dream.
L0oniX
Jun 2015
#98
Sorta get the impression that Hillary hopes she has the same effect in Eastern Europe & Iran.
leveymg
Jun 2015
#71
oh, so she wants to discuss ISIS's origins, Ukraine, our soaring military budget, Israel, Russia,
MisterP
Jun 2015
#49
It's increasingly difficult to defend the House of Saud and the US Constitution simultaneously.
leveymg
Jun 2015
#66
Hey Hillary, Chelsea is still young enough to enlist. What is she waiting for?
BeanMusical
Jun 2015
#78
I wish you were right that she's just another tired, self-interested pol. Rather, she still has a
leveymg
Jun 2015
#113
She may honestly believe she's still a member of the Middle Class and hasn't a clue
leveymg
Jun 2015
#124
The very rich and the very poor are a lot alike. They tend to let their children run wild,
leveymg
Jun 2015
#130
I feel it in my bones and this OP is nearly EXACTLY what I have been trying to say. And yet...
Bonobo
Jun 2015
#117
When a candidate says they are going to "protect America" it's code for "more money to the MIC". nm
rhett o rick
Jun 2015
#173
God! She's positioning herself as the next WAR PRESIDENT! Follow in W and Cheney's footsteps!
Kablooie
Jun 2015
#134
I understand her need to show her ability to be able to be a war President, but Sept 11 references..
marble falls
Jun 2015
#135
Unfotunately, there will be wars because there are leaders of countries that want it....
Gloria
Jun 2015
#138
The issue was clearly Clinton's bellicose speech. Please try to keep up. n/t
RufusTFirefly
Jun 2015
#145
It's about what she'd be like as president...not about tearing her down as a person.
Ken Burch
Jun 2015
#153
Warring and Foundationing, warring and foundationing warring and foundationing - money and
DhhD
Jun 2015
#163
exactly-- well said. She's a creature of the war machine and the war racket.
Fast Walker 52
Jun 2015
#168
After listening to HRC's speech, and then reading it, then reading the commentaries,
GoneOffShore
Jun 2015
#195