Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
Sat Jun 13, 2015, 06:20 PM Jun 2015

You can ignore it all you want [View all]

But it's here.

Fukushima has increased the background radiation levels in the Pacific ocean by 600%.

Before Fukushima blew up and began dumping radiated water in the ocean, rad levels were at 1. Those levels are now above 6 and due to increase.

All kinds of sea life is being washed up on the shores of the west coast and the scientists are befuddled, and they specifically state they are not testing for radiation in the dead animals.

38 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
You can ignore it all you want [View all] RobertEarl Jun 2015 OP
How stupid is that? 99th_Monkey Jun 2015 #1
Who is paying the scientists? LiberalEsto Jun 2015 #2
They are only scientists... Fairgo Jun 2015 #16
Japan has a lot of power in this world. MoonRiver Jun 2015 #3
Who is they? Make7 Jun 2015 #4
That's my question too. nt 99th_Monkey Jun 2015 #33
'They' is RobertEarl Jun 2015 #38
Links to info? PowerToThePeople Jun 2015 #5
Inb4 Arnie Gunderson, Helen Caldicott and ENEnews... SidDithers Jun 2015 #6
but seriously, G_j Jun 2015 #7
Source RobertEarl Jun 2015 #20
Screw that link RobertEarl Jun 2015 #28
Isn't the EPA's Maximum Contaminant Level for Cs137 in drinking water 7400 Bq/m3? ( n/t ) Make7 Jun 2015 #34
Would you drink that? RobertEarl Jun 2015 #35
Bullshit. eom MohRokTah Jun 2015 #8
Lol! zappaman Jun 2015 #9
rad levels of 6 what sharp_stick Jun 2015 #10
This message was self-deleted by its author FBaggins Jun 2015 #11
Which is it? Dishonesty... ignorance... or just really bad at math? FBaggins Jun 2015 #12
(cover ears) La-la-la... nt raccoon Jun 2015 #13
"Those levels are now above 6 and due to increase." NuclearDem Jun 2015 #14
OK. Thanks. I'll do that. MineralMan Jun 2015 #15
Correction RobertEarl Jun 2015 #19
I would be very interested in hearing more about this Chemisse Jun 2015 #17
Data RobertEarl Jun 2015 #18
According to your source, the levels are not rising and may be dropping csziggy Jun 2015 #21
Yeah, they are afraid of posting new data RobertEarl Jun 2015 #22
so you can't actually link to anything showing what you're claiming then? tammywammy Jun 2015 #23
Best I could find right now RobertEarl Jun 2015 #27
Keep searching. zappaman Jun 2015 #30
How can you expect him to link to his imagination? FBaggins Jun 2015 #31
So your source does not post the data to support their claims? csziggy Jun 2015 #24
I took a screen shot from there RobertEarl Jun 2015 #25
The data hasn't been "scrubbed" FBaggins Jun 2015 #32
Yep RobertEarl Jun 2015 #36
There are more oxygen depleted dead zones, resulting in applegrove Jun 2015 #26
Everyone has ignored cwydro Jun 2015 #29
What sea life is washed up on shores that befuddle scientists? Velella velella, like have happened uppityperson Jun 2015 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»You can ignore it all you...