Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Not good: REPORT: RUSSIA, CHINA CRACK SNOWDEN DOCS [View all]MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)15. Right on… Move on, people… nothing to see here...
Hey, hows cuz nobody's upset an at about this?
The forms authorities believed may have been stolen en masse, known as Standard Form 86, require applicants to fill out deeply personal information about mental illnesses, drug and alcohol use, past arrests and bankruptcies. They also require the listing of contacts and relatives, potentially exposing any foreign relatives of U.S. intelligence employees to coercion. Both the applicant's Social Security number and that of his or her cohabitant is required.
No Let's skewer Mr. Snowden!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
94 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yes and that couldn't possibly have happened because they cracked snowdens encription.
Egnever
Jun 2015
#66
His encription? Like they hacked into his computer to know who is hacking into his computer
JonLP24
Jun 2015
#92
Only if he shares a cell with Dick Cheney and Karl Rove (remember Valerie Plame?).
WinkyDink
Jun 2015
#9
… which if that was what he did, would be entirely wrong… but it wasn't...
MrMickeysMom
Jun 2015
#26
It would appear that actual documentation of what happened would help you...
MrMickeysMom
Jun 2015
#59
I still don't believe the ends support the means here, there was a better way other than running to
uponit7771
Jun 2015
#13
Even if half true it's 100% bad, Snowden could've raised attention to this matter in a legal way
uponit7771
Jun 2015
#11
You do not know the meaning of haphazard. The journalists he chose was deliberate.
Luminous Animal
Jun 2015
#87
Richard Clarke has been saying for a long time that Snowden belongs in prison
BeyondGeography
Jun 2015
#51