Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 12:46 AM Jun 2015

Here's what I'd really like to hear a presidential candidate say about "keeping Americans safe" [View all]

"As president, I will work to keep the people of this country safe.

And I will work to keep the rest of the human race safe as well.

While I will defend our territory from external military attack, I will NOT equate 'keeping Americans safe' with the use of force for force's sake, nor will I regard true negotiations and genuine compromise as weakness or equate them to the extinct concept of 'appeasement'.

We are past the days when a Hitler could emerge...past the days when a Stalin or a Mao might appear. And we are past the days when it could ever be useful to automatically label other countries as 'enemies' or 'threats'.

In the world we now inhabit, there are simply nations...each of which has positive and negative traits, none of which are totally right or totally wrong.

I will protect the safety of the American people not through foreign wars, not through drone attacks, not through surveillance, infiltration or internal intervention but by joining forces with all who devote their lives to fighting the true threats to that safety:

Poverty, ignorance, disease, inequality, hatred, nationalism and the unjust concentration of the wealth created by the many in the hands of the few.

I will work for a safe and secure nation and world by peacefully combatting all of those threats, and by making sure that this country will not stand in the way of those who seek to cast off oppressive rulers, dominance by foreign corporations, religious fundamentalists of all faiths, and corruption at all levels.

I will make it clear that 'the national interest' of the United States shall no longer be tied to the short-term interests of American and multinational corporations, but rather to the right, possessed by every child of this Earth, to a decent life and a real future, a future in which there shall be work for all, respect for all, dignity for all, free expression for all, and creativity, magic and joy for all.

And in standing for all of this, I will give this country the greatest number of allies possible...all the peoples of every nation".

Not expecting anyone to say that anytime soon, but it's MY idea of a sane, acceptable version of "whatever it takes".

40 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
We are past the days of labeling countries as "enemies" or "threats"? Nye Bevan Jun 2015 #1
Maybe if we weren't always threatening and dictating marym625 Jun 2015 #3
Simply nations. PatrickforO Jun 2015 #13
It's perfect less one thing marym625 Jun 2015 #2
You're right about that threat. Thanks. n/t Ken Burch Jun 2015 #4
No, thank you. seriously. eom. marym625 Jun 2015 #5
Hadn't heard about the Louisville incident. Damn. Ken Burch Jun 2015 #6
It was posted by Judi Lynn right before your post marym625 Jun 2015 #9
Those are beautiful ideas. but sadoldgirl Jun 2015 #7
It is an uphill struggle. Ken Burch Jun 2015 #8
"We are past the days when a Hitler could emerge...past the days when a Stalin Snobblevitch Jun 2015 #10
True. We will never be past the unthinkable; human history proves it over and over again. n/t susanna Jun 2015 #17
Agree. The next Stalin may well be named Scott Walker. Scuba Jun 2015 #38
I highly doubt Walker would ever come close to what Stalin did. Snobblevitch Jun 2015 #40
I would vote for you if you were running for President. SaranchaIsWaiting Jun 2015 #11
You are on a roll today Kalidurga Jun 2015 #12
I like your post... SoapBox Jun 2015 #14
Never happen. joshcryer Jun 2015 #15
"To not stand powerful in that position is a loser approach. " < By starting losing wars? After all jtuck004 Jun 2015 #16
Our police are more dangerous than terrorists. joshcryer Jun 2015 #18
Agreed on that. Ken Burch Jun 2015 #21
Not disagreeing, but I think our bank$ter/donors are more dangerous than the police. The jtuck004 Jun 2015 #23
That was a travesty. joshcryer Jun 2015 #26
They did miscalculate, but the bank$ter/donors knew exactly what they were doing, and began a theft jtuck004 Jun 2015 #31
I think F&F was the target all along. joshcryer Jun 2015 #34
To call ourselves "the world's only superpower" is arrogant and internationally toxic. Ken Burch Jun 2015 #19
It is not an exaggeration or arrogant. joshcryer Jun 2015 #20
Yeltsin designated Putin as his successor. That's the only reason Putin was able to take power. Ken Burch Jun 2015 #22
When on earth did Yeltsin designate Putin as his successor? joshcryer Jun 2015 #24
Here you go: Ken Burch Jun 2015 #28
I do think he has support. joshcryer Jun 2015 #30
Indeed they have. Ken Burch Jun 2015 #33
I agree. Stevepol Jun 2015 #29
Careful how you add all that up. That GDP used to be spread among a lot more people than jtuck004 Jun 2015 #25
It is true GDP was more spread out. joshcryer Jun 2015 #27
I didn't think you did - what I meant was that I don't think we are the superpower jtuck004 Jun 2015 #32
Let's put it this way: joshcryer Jun 2015 #35
Oh yeah. A few weeks back there was a cardinal on tv, being interviewed about jtuck004 Jun 2015 #37
The world no longer needs superpowers. Ken Burch Jun 2015 #36
I'll buy dat! Dems to Win Jun 2015 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Here's what I'd really li...