Q. Did Hillary Clinton donate all monies received from speaking fees to charity?

[NanceGreggs]

46. No problem.

Our exchange begins at Reply #13 in http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026819265#, where you describe the Clintons’ speaking fees as “take home” pay.

At Reply #34, I ask you to provide links showing that HRC’s speaking fees were not donated. You never do.

At Reply #56, you claim to be “fascinated by the absurd claim that the Clintons gave their entire income to charity!”- despite the fact that no one claimed that the Clintons (plural) donated their “entire income” to charity – well, no one other than you.

No one in that thread – or elsewhere – ever claimed that the Clintons “gave their entire income to charity”. That was YOUR assertion – no one else’s.

Reply #62 stated: “Perhaps if you had something to say that people would pay to hear, you could show us all the proper way to handle that good fortune!”. Your response at Reply #65 was, “So you also claim that the Clintons give all payments from speaking fees to charity?” A fascinating non-sequitar, given that the reply you responded to said nothing about “claiming the Clintons give all speaking fees to charity”.

In Reply #106, you deliver your “theory” about “private income”. Apparently you have come up with an idea that the IRS itself has never heard of. “Her (HRC’s) speaking fees were private income. Not ‘charity’ ”.

As anyone who has ever filed an income tax return can tell you, ALL income must be declared as income, regardless of where it winds up. Charitable donation credits are assessed – and credits given as a result thereof – which result in a reduction of taxes owing. There is no such animal as “private income”.

At Reply #111 you claim that “THERE IS NO EVIDENCE, ANYWHERE, THAT HILLARY CLINTON DONATED ALL HER INCOME FROM SPEAKING FEES TO CHARITY.” (In all CAPS, no less!)

I suppose the IRS’s acceptance of HRC’s charitable donations aren’t enough evidence for you.

I again urge you to contact the media and spill the beans about the blatant LIE that Hillary’s speaking fees were never donated to charity – and she should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law for any claims that she did so.

Why waste valuable time posting on DU, when you have the “proof” that she duped the IRS – along with millions of voters – into believing she “donated” speaking fees that she actually didn’t?

I’ll be watching the Sunday news media tomorrow for your “late breaking story” – it’s going to be HUGH!!! I’m series!!!

I can play this game all night long, sweetums. If Hillary has falsely claimed to have donated her speaking fees to charity, the "librul media" would be all over her ass - as would the IRS. Apparently they are waiting for a concerned citizen such as yourself to come forward with "the truth" - so give it 'em. And don't forget to post those links to her malfeasance - ya know, the ones you couldn't "find" to post here.