Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

joshcryer

(62,536 posts)
18. Our police are more dangerous than terrorists.
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 03:37 AM
Jun 2015

So if a candidate talks about "doing anything to get terrorists" I take it with a grain of salt.

If they talk about "doing something about police brutality" I will listen more carefully.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

We are past the days of labeling countries as "enemies" or "threats"? Nye Bevan Jun 2015 #1
Maybe if we weren't always threatening and dictating marym625 Jun 2015 #3
Simply nations. PatrickforO Jun 2015 #13
It's perfect less one thing marym625 Jun 2015 #2
You're right about that threat. Thanks. n/t Ken Burch Jun 2015 #4
No, thank you. seriously. eom. marym625 Jun 2015 #5
Hadn't heard about the Louisville incident. Damn. Ken Burch Jun 2015 #6
It was posted by Judi Lynn right before your post marym625 Jun 2015 #9
Those are beautiful ideas. but sadoldgirl Jun 2015 #7
It is an uphill struggle. Ken Burch Jun 2015 #8
"We are past the days when a Hitler could emerge...past the days when a Stalin Snobblevitch Jun 2015 #10
True. We will never be past the unthinkable; human history proves it over and over again. n/t susanna Jun 2015 #17
Agree. The next Stalin may well be named Scott Walker. Scuba Jun 2015 #38
I highly doubt Walker would ever come close to what Stalin did. Snobblevitch Jun 2015 #40
I would vote for you if you were running for President. SaranchaIsWaiting Jun 2015 #11
You are on a roll today Kalidurga Jun 2015 #12
I like your post... SoapBox Jun 2015 #14
Never happen. joshcryer Jun 2015 #15
"To not stand powerful in that position is a loser approach. " < By starting losing wars? After all jtuck004 Jun 2015 #16
Our police are more dangerous than terrorists. joshcryer Jun 2015 #18
Agreed on that. Ken Burch Jun 2015 #21
Not disagreeing, but I think our bank$ter/donors are more dangerous than the police. The jtuck004 Jun 2015 #23
That was a travesty. joshcryer Jun 2015 #26
They did miscalculate, but the bank$ter/donors knew exactly what they were doing, and began a theft jtuck004 Jun 2015 #31
I think F&F was the target all along. joshcryer Jun 2015 #34
To call ourselves "the world's only superpower" is arrogant and internationally toxic. Ken Burch Jun 2015 #19
It is not an exaggeration or arrogant. joshcryer Jun 2015 #20
Yeltsin designated Putin as his successor. That's the only reason Putin was able to take power. Ken Burch Jun 2015 #22
When on earth did Yeltsin designate Putin as his successor? joshcryer Jun 2015 #24
Here you go: Ken Burch Jun 2015 #28
I do think he has support. joshcryer Jun 2015 #30
Indeed they have. Ken Burch Jun 2015 #33
I agree. Stevepol Jun 2015 #29
Careful how you add all that up. That GDP used to be spread among a lot more people than jtuck004 Jun 2015 #25
It is true GDP was more spread out. joshcryer Jun 2015 #27
I didn't think you did - what I meant was that I don't think we are the superpower jtuck004 Jun 2015 #32
Let's put it this way: joshcryer Jun 2015 #35
Oh yeah. A few weeks back there was a cardinal on tv, being interviewed about jtuck004 Jun 2015 #37
The world no longer needs superpowers. Ken Burch Jun 2015 #36
I'll buy dat! Dems to Win Jun 2015 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Here's what I'd really li...»Reply #18