Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
33. Indeed they have.
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 04:12 AM
Jun 2015

But if he hadn't been abruptly elevated into the job, he wouldn't have had the chance to rig them. Always seemed to me that the West wanted somebody like him running Russia so they wouldn't have to get out of the habit of being at odds with the place-as if the just couldn't let the Cold War totally end.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

We are past the days of labeling countries as "enemies" or "threats"? Nye Bevan Jun 2015 #1
Maybe if we weren't always threatening and dictating marym625 Jun 2015 #3
Simply nations. PatrickforO Jun 2015 #13
It's perfect less one thing marym625 Jun 2015 #2
You're right about that threat. Thanks. n/t Ken Burch Jun 2015 #4
No, thank you. seriously. eom. marym625 Jun 2015 #5
Hadn't heard about the Louisville incident. Damn. Ken Burch Jun 2015 #6
It was posted by Judi Lynn right before your post marym625 Jun 2015 #9
Those are beautiful ideas. but sadoldgirl Jun 2015 #7
It is an uphill struggle. Ken Burch Jun 2015 #8
"We are past the days when a Hitler could emerge...past the days when a Stalin Snobblevitch Jun 2015 #10
True. We will never be past the unthinkable; human history proves it over and over again. n/t susanna Jun 2015 #17
Agree. The next Stalin may well be named Scott Walker. Scuba Jun 2015 #38
I highly doubt Walker would ever come close to what Stalin did. Snobblevitch Jun 2015 #40
I would vote for you if you were running for President. SaranchaIsWaiting Jun 2015 #11
You are on a roll today Kalidurga Jun 2015 #12
I like your post... SoapBox Jun 2015 #14
Never happen. joshcryer Jun 2015 #15
"To not stand powerful in that position is a loser approach. " < By starting losing wars? After all jtuck004 Jun 2015 #16
Our police are more dangerous than terrorists. joshcryer Jun 2015 #18
Agreed on that. Ken Burch Jun 2015 #21
Not disagreeing, but I think our bank$ter/donors are more dangerous than the police. The jtuck004 Jun 2015 #23
That was a travesty. joshcryer Jun 2015 #26
They did miscalculate, but the bank$ter/donors knew exactly what they were doing, and began a theft jtuck004 Jun 2015 #31
I think F&F was the target all along. joshcryer Jun 2015 #34
To call ourselves "the world's only superpower" is arrogant and internationally toxic. Ken Burch Jun 2015 #19
It is not an exaggeration or arrogant. joshcryer Jun 2015 #20
Yeltsin designated Putin as his successor. That's the only reason Putin was able to take power. Ken Burch Jun 2015 #22
When on earth did Yeltsin designate Putin as his successor? joshcryer Jun 2015 #24
Here you go: Ken Burch Jun 2015 #28
I do think he has support. joshcryer Jun 2015 #30
Indeed they have. Ken Burch Jun 2015 #33
I agree. Stevepol Jun 2015 #29
Careful how you add all that up. That GDP used to be spread among a lot more people than jtuck004 Jun 2015 #25
It is true GDP was more spread out. joshcryer Jun 2015 #27
I didn't think you did - what I meant was that I don't think we are the superpower jtuck004 Jun 2015 #32
Let's put it this way: joshcryer Jun 2015 #35
Oh yeah. A few weeks back there was a cardinal on tv, being interviewed about jtuck004 Jun 2015 #37
The world no longer needs superpowers. Ken Burch Jun 2015 #36
I'll buy dat! Dems to Win Jun 2015 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Here's what I'd really li...»Reply #33