Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why Edward Snowden Belongs in Prison [View all]Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)47. A review of Greenwald's first book, How Would a Patriot Act..
https://books.google.com/books/about/How_Would_a_Patriot_Act.html?id=1XgaAQAAIAAJ&source=kp_cover&hl=en
Of all the scathing indictments of the Bush administration, this book may be the most so. Not hysterical at all, no knee-jerk liberal reactionary, constitutional lawyer Glenn Greenwald lays out in a jam-packed-with-information 128 pages (I used 68 page markers in all on this book, well more than my usual 50 or so for a book twice that length) exactly how and why this administration is the most lawless ever to hold office. Not only are they lawless, he shows, but they are attempting to fundamentally alter our system of government through a pattern of deceit and unilateral decision-making. Completely bypassing or ignoring laws such as FISA, by eavesdropping (something no one has a problem with) without a warrant (something MANY people have a problem with), anti-torture legislation, etc., the administration is putting forth a theory of the Constitution, laid out in black and white by administration attorney John Yoo, that the President has UNLIMITED authority in matters of national security. Thus, he can do, quite literally, ANYTHING he wants if he deems it necessary to national security, and cannot be checked by either of the other two branches of government. This includes the ability to lock up American citizens, without a hearing of ANY KIND, nor access to legal representation, FOR LIFE. Therefore, under this theory, if the courts make a decision, or Congress passes a law, he can simply ignore it - it does not apply to him. There have been at least two instances of American citizens being jailed for years at a time without access to courts - and when challenged by others, they simply punt - in one case, charging the individual with an unrelated crime to what he was jailed for and insisting that the challenge to Bush's authority was now moot, and in the other, simply forcing the person to renounce his citizenship and setting him free. There is really no way of knowing how many others are in this situation.
This is dangerous stuff, and Greenwald does an excellent job of laying out before the reader how exactly the administration is doing this, I can only encourage all persons of liberal, moderate, or non-authoritarian conservative bents to read this book. The one criticism I have would be that there are no footnotes, but all of these items have been reported by major media at one point or another, and are easily uncovered with a simple google search.
While Greenwald barely mentions impeachment in this book, the implication is clear - this President has openly admitted committing what amount to high crimes and misdemeanors.
This is dangerous stuff, and Greenwald does an excellent job of laying out before the reader how exactly the administration is doing this, I can only encourage all persons of liberal, moderate, or non-authoritarian conservative bents to read this book. The one criticism I have would be that there are no footnotes, but all of these items have been reported by major media at one point or another, and are easily uncovered with a simple google search.
While Greenwald barely mentions impeachment in this book, the implication is clear - this President has openly admitted committing what amount to high crimes and misdemeanors.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
94 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"Funny, Snowden despised leakers & those who put spies' lives at risk until *this* President was
Cha
Jun 2015
#3
Good that our site's resident Tories put so much faith in the anonymous Tory sources over there...
villager
Jun 2015
#77
I'm pretty sure that most people are able to focus on more than one story at any given time.
LanternWaste
Jun 2015
#72
I know it. But anybody that sounds as though their mom still does their laundry shouldn't really be
GoneFishin
Jun 2015
#16
Yep. If there weren't rogue spying activities being carried out against innocent Americans, and
GoneFishin
Jun 2015
#18
And This Is Why Hillary Will Have Difficulties... Nobody Is Buying This Crap Anymore...
WillyT
Jun 2015
#25
We aren't buying your crap and the anonymous sources that pushes this crap.
Luminous Animal
Jun 2015
#32
I am waiting for the new set of lies Snowden will be telling next, I am sure he will have a
Thinkingabout
Jun 2015
#36
Oh, please, your evidence is anything a right-wing British government and anonymous intelligence
Hissyspit
Jun 2015
#71
After having lived through the Iraq War and the garbage stenography that made it to the front pages
Hissyspit
Jun 2015
#78
I used to think I had a pretty Manichean view of the world but the denizens of this board
DemocratSinceBirth
Jun 2015
#83
Well, the American people have already made up their minds about the idiot. And "hero" doesn't.....
Tarheel_Dem
Jun 2015
#84