Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

YOHABLO

(7,358 posts)
41. Yep they want to make it harder for women to get an abortion, and then of course they want to cut
Mon Jun 15, 2015, 12:36 AM
Jun 2015

all services that would help young mothers in feeding, clothing, and educating their children. hmm what to do.

Yeah, why do women of Texas vote Republican? Answer: they're stupid.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That sure as hell is an undue burden. Assholes. CaliforniaPeggy Jun 2015 #1
And the war on women rages on... beam me up scottie Jun 2015 #2
By the Gyno Oppression Party. nt valerief Jun 2015 #31
And some people Aerows Jun 2015 #3
And Texas sure as hell doesn't want to feed, provide health care, or educate them, cuz you know, Dustlawyer Jun 2015 #36
It makes me sick. Aerows Jun 2015 #37
WTFFFFFF! Rex Jun 2015 #4
@$#? nt SusanCalvin Jun 2015 #5
I've faced off with some of these idiots in the past, many are like glassy eyed rapid mindless AuntPatsy Jun 2015 #6
You are exactly right...I asked one why I had to follow Gloria Jun 2015 #14
What you have in Texas (and other places) are two religious principles goading each other to jwirr Jun 2015 #19
Yet most of these pious "pro-life" worshipers LiberalLovinLug Jun 2015 #25
So why aren't these rules applied to all outpatient surgical procedures? jeff47 Jun 2015 #7
that's the answer greymattermom Jun 2015 #33
Men specifically? Vasectomy. But there's plenty of gender-neutral ones. (nt) jeff47 Jun 2015 #34
Coming soon, to a state near you. countryjake Jun 2015 #8
You got that right. Unfortunately. kairos12 Jun 2015 #15
The most unfortunate thing about this ruling is who will suffer from it. countryjake Jun 2015 #16
Friend of mine told me long ago that abortion has always been legal for the rich. Either their own jwirr Jun 2015 #21
There is no "undue burden" for the wealthy Novara Jun 2015 #22
Raises hand...that's me. countryjake Jun 2015 #26
Ugh Egnever Jun 2015 #9
This must surely go to the Supreme Court LittleBlue Jun 2015 #10
Yup nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #12
Thank you! marym625 Jun 2015 #11
F Texas. the_sly_pig Jun 2015 #13
You can't just say, "Fuck Texas". It's happening all over the nation. countryjake Jun 2015 #27
You seem to have mistyped. kentauros Jun 2015 #32
Patriarchy resurgent. The poorest, most vulnerable women & children will suffer most of course. appalachiablue Jun 2015 #17
Discriminatory. moondust Jun 2015 #18
They were worried Wisconsin was going to surpass them Prism Jun 2015 #20
They're using a blowtorch Novara Jun 2015 #23
Well, there's always Mexico KamaAina Jun 2015 #24
women of Texas.. why do you vote for repubs? Liberal_in_LA Jun 2015 #28
Is that, by any chance, what you call "ACTIVIST judges" world wide wally Jun 2015 #29
Yeah, but only liberal activist judges are a problem, not conservative ones Novara Jun 2015 #30
any of you of the earlier generation remembered these for abortion tools ? allan01 Jun 2015 #35
This court exemplifies Arby Jun 2015 #38
I can't imagine that this ruling will stand. secondwind Jun 2015 #39
Bump... DreamSmoker Jun 2015 #40
Yep they want to make it harder for women to get an abortion, and then of course they want to cut YOHABLO Jun 2015 #41
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Nation's Most Conserv...»Reply #41