Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Mon Jun 15, 2015, 08:02 AM Jun 2015

I keep thinking about the dangers posed by Corporate Dems who are socially liberal [View all]

Jim Himes is a stark illustration. I believe these people are a real threat- not just to the party, but to the country. Himes says the right things and he votes the right way on social and civil rights issues, but he has done very little for minorities, the poor and the struggling middle class, in his district. He's certainly been there for his wealthy constituents. And yes, he's pro TPP.

Himes, former Goldman Sachs VP, represents the district with the greatest wealth disparity in the entire country. He represents Bridgeport, poor, with a minority majority and he represents some of the wealthiest communities in the nation; the gold coast towns of Fairfield County, including Greenwich, Hedge Fund capitol of the world.

He has an excellent voting record on social issues.

Here is an example of what he's done for his wealthy Wall Street/Hedge Fund constituents:

<snip>

On March 6, 2013, Himes co-sponsored H.R. 992 [18] which rolls-back provisions in section 716 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Citigroup’s recommendations were reflected in more than 70 lines of the House Financial Services committee’s 85-line bill. Two crucial paragraphs, prepared by Citigroup in conjunction with other Wall Street banks, were copied nearly word for word.[19] According to the Congressional Budget Office[20] "H.R. 992 would allow certain financial firms to retain financial portfolios containing swaps while remaining eligible for assistance from the Federal Reserve and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)."

Voted affirmative for H.R. 922. the Swaps Regulatory Improvement Act.[21]

Voted for H.R. 2374, the Retail Investor Protection Act.[22]

<snip>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Himes


More warning signs:

The Campaign to Fix the Debt has named Congressman Jim Himes (CT-4) one of 32 inaugural “Fiscal Heroes” for placing a priority on fixing the debt. The Campaign to Fix the Debt is a non-partisan organization dedicated to putting America on a better fiscal and economic path.

<snip>

“These Members have in a variety of ways played a leadership role in focusing national attention on the pressing issue of the debt and have been working to forge credible solutions,” said Maya MacGuineas, head of the Campaign to Fix the Debt. “They all share a recognition that we will need to take a comprehensive approach to address the core drivers of the debt, and they are willing to confront the policy challenges of coming up with solutions. Given that there is much more to be done to confront the nation's debt challenges, it is important to recognize those who are focusing on these issues.”

Himes was previously recognized by the Concord Coalition for being among the “Brave 38” Members of Congress to vote for the Simpson-Bowles budget proposal.


http://himes.house.gov/press-release/himes-named-%E2%80%9Cfiscal-hero%E2%80%9D-commitment-fiscal-responsibility

Top progressive group comes out against Himes as DCCC chair


http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/224062-top-progressive-group-comes-out-against-himes-as-dccc-chair

44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
But but but…social justice is more important than income inequality! tularetom Jun 2015 #1
There is no social justice LWolf Jun 2015 #8
but, but, but there is nothing confusing about heaven05 Jun 2015 #25
I'm actually married to one - TBF Jun 2015 #2
Is that "anti-psychotic Republicans". or "Republicans on antipsychotics"? Ken Burch Jun 2015 #4
to me these are the old Rockefeller Republicans of my youth rurallib Jun 2015 #11
I'm a little younger - TBF Jun 2015 #12
I agree. And also people who say the right things about economic policy, but tend to ignore severe DanTex Jun 2015 #3
i can't think of a single one. and sorry but bernie's record on social/civil rights issues cali Jun 2015 #6
Sure you can. His name is Bernie, he voted against the Brady bill, in favor of legal immunity for DanTex Jun 2015 #10
keep fuckin that chicken frylock Jun 2015 #17
unwarranted heaven05 Jun 2015 #26
really? in response to "teabaggerish views on guns"? frylock Jun 2015 #28
Yes, teabaggerish views on guns. How else would you describe someone who thinks DanTex Jun 2015 #30
this seems to be your assigned task, so like i said before.. frylock Jun 2015 #32
Yeah, I wouldn't want to discuss the issue either if I was in your position. DanTex Jun 2015 #33
The issue has been discussed.. frylock Jun 2015 #34
So you just chimed in here to insult me then? That was your whole purpose here? DanTex Jun 2015 #37
I chimed in because I've grown weary of these same recycled talking points.. frylock Jun 2015 #38
Interesting. That's the same reason I chimed in. The OP's use of recycled talking points to bash DanTex Jun 2015 #39
Hey! Good for you! frylock Jun 2015 #40
Yup. It's the Goldman-Sachs-owned corporatist versus the teabagging gun nut. DanTex Jun 2015 #42
How much money has Sanders taken from gun manufacturers again? frylock Jun 2015 #43
I have no idea. You see, I like both Bernie and Hillary, DanTex Jun 2015 #44
lol. you're desperation has an odor cali Jun 2015 #21
Interesting. Well at least you're done pretending that you care about issues. DanTex Jun 2015 #29
a great danger treestar Jun 2015 #5
lol. you mean like hillary's racist appeals in 2008. sorry, he doesn't have that history cali Jun 2015 #7
Hillary isn't trying to get those voters treestar Jun 2015 #9
I think of such people as Libertarian Lite Lydia Leftcoast Jun 2015 #13
Great post! The voting records always exposes corporate ass-lickers.... dmosh42 Jun 2015 #14
K&R CharlotteVale Jun 2015 #15
I keep thinking about the dangers posed by Corporate GOPers who are socially conservative onehandle Jun 2015 #16
Yeah, there's that! Good perspective. mountain grammy Jun 2015 #19
yes, but that is obvious. this is insidious and threatens our own party. cali Jun 2015 #23
big problem heaven05 Jun 2015 #27
The emphasis on debt angers me because this type is forever blaming our debt on social programs. jwirr Jun 2015 #18
Lieberman comes to mind! *gag*.nt m-lekktor Jun 2015 #20
Himes is my rep and I happen to like him. Nye Bevan Jun 2015 #22
of course you do. your lack pf concern for minorities is frequently noted here. cali Jun 2015 #24
"The most conservative poster here"? Really? Nye Bevan Jun 2015 #35
Not just a threat to our democracy, but to all democracies. nt raouldukelives Jun 2015 #31
So-called Democrats like Himes need primary challengers who are fiscal progressives meow2u3 Jun 2015 #36
Corporate Democrats don't see the connections between economic mmonk Jun 2015 #41
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I keep thinking about the...