General Discussion

DanTex

(20,709 posts)

42. Yup. It's the Goldman-Sachs-owned corporatist versus the teabagging gun nut.

Reply to frylock (Reply #40)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 07:30 PM

Jun 2015

Rinse and repeat.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

44 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I keep thinking about the dangers posed by Corporate Dems who are socially liberal [View all] cali Jun 2015 OP

But but but�social justice is more important than income inequality! tularetom Jun 2015 #1

There is no social justice LWolf Jun 2015 #8

but, but, but there is nothing confusing about heaven05 Jun 2015 #25

I'm actually married to one - TBF Jun 2015 #2

Is that "anti-psychotic Republicans". or "Republicans on antipsychotics"? Ken Burch Jun 2015 #4

to me these are the old Rockefeller Republicans of my youth rurallib Jun 2015 #11

I'm a little younger - TBF Jun 2015 #12

I agree. And also people who say the right things about economic policy, but tend to ignore severe DanTex Jun 2015 #3

i can't think of a single one. and sorry but bernie's record on social/civil rights issues cali Jun 2015 #6

Sure you can. His name is Bernie, he voted against the Brady bill, in favor of legal immunity for DanTex Jun 2015 #10

keep fuckin that chicken frylock Jun 2015 #17

unwarranted heaven05 Jun 2015 #26

really? in response to "teabaggerish views on guns"? frylock Jun 2015 #28

Yes, teabaggerish views on guns. How else would you describe someone who thinks DanTex Jun 2015 #30

this seems to be your assigned task, so like i said before.. frylock Jun 2015 #32

Yeah, I wouldn't want to discuss the issue either if I was in your position. DanTex Jun 2015 #33

The issue has been discussed.. frylock Jun 2015 #34

So you just chimed in here to insult me then? That was your whole purpose here? DanTex Jun 2015 #37

I chimed in because I've grown weary of these same recycled talking points.. frylock Jun 2015 #38

Interesting. That's the same reason I chimed in. The OP's use of recycled talking points to bash DanTex Jun 2015 #39

Hey! Good for you! frylock Jun 2015 #40

Yup. It's the Goldman-Sachs-owned corporatist versus the teabagging gun nut. DanTex Jun 2015 #42

How much money has Sanders taken from gun manufacturers again? frylock Jun 2015 #43

I have no idea. You see, I like both Bernie and Hillary, DanTex Jun 2015 #44

lol. you're desperation has an odor cali Jun 2015 #21

Interesting. Well at least you're done pretending that you care about issues. DanTex Jun 2015 #29

a great danger treestar Jun 2015 #5

lol. you mean like hillary's racist appeals in 2008. sorry, he doesn't have that history cali Jun 2015 #7

Hillary isn't trying to get those voters treestar Jun 2015 #9

I think of such people as Libertarian Lite Lydia Leftcoast Jun 2015 #13

Great post! The voting records always exposes corporate ass-lickers.... dmosh42 Jun 2015 #14

K&R CharlotteVale Jun 2015 #15

I keep thinking about the dangers posed by Corporate GOPers who are socially conservative onehandle Jun 2015 #16

Yeah, there's that! Good perspective. mountain grammy Jun 2015 #19

yes, but that is obvious. this is insidious and threatens our own party. cali Jun 2015 #23

big problem heaven05 Jun 2015 #27

The emphasis on debt angers me because this type is forever blaming our debt on social programs. jwirr Jun 2015 #18

Lieberman comes to mind! *gag*.nt m-lekktor Jun 2015 #20

Himes is my rep and I happen to like him. Nye Bevan Jun 2015 #22

of course you do. your lack pf concern for minorities is frequently noted here. cali Jun 2015 #24

"The most conservative poster here"? Really? Nye Bevan Jun 2015 #35

Not just a threat to our democracy, but to all democracies. nt raouldukelives Jun 2015 #31

So-called Democrats like Himes need primary challengers who are fiscal progressives meow2u3 Jun 2015 #36

Corporate Democrats don't see the connections between economic mmonk Jun 2015 #41