Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Reporter Who Wrote Times 'Snowden' Propaganda Admits He's Just Writing What UK Gov't Told Him [View all]
Reporter Who Wrote Sunday Times 'Snowden' Propaganda Admits That He's Just Writing What UK Gov't Told Him
So we've already written about the massive problems with the Sunday Times' big report claiming that the Russians and Chinese had "cracked" the encryption on the Snowden files (or possibly just been handed those files by Snowden) and that he had "blood on his hands" even though no one has come to any harm. It also argued that David Miranda was detained after he got documents from Snowden in Moscow, despite the fact that he was neither in Moscow, nor had met Snowden (a claim the article quietly deleted). That same report also claimed that UK intelligence agency MI6 had to remove "agents" from Moscow because of this leak, despite the fact that they're not called "agents" and there's no evidence of any actual risk. So far, the only official response from News Corp. the publisher of The Sunday Times (through a variety of subsidiaries) was to try to censor the criticism of the story with a DMCA takedown request.
Either way, one of the journalists who wrote the story, Tom Harper, gave an interview to CNN which is quite incredible to watch. Harper just keeps repeating that he doesn't know what's actually true, and that he was just saying what the government told him -- more or less admitting that his role here was not as a reporter, but as a propagandist or a stenographer. ............(more)
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20150615/11565531344/reporter-who-wrote-sunday-times-snowden-propaganda-admits-that-hes-just-writing-what-uk-govt-told-him.shtml
103 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Reporter Who Wrote Times 'Snowden' Propaganda Admits He's Just Writing What UK Gov't Told Him [View all]
marmar
Jun 2015
OP
I agree--he should have gotten an "opposing view" quote. There's more here, certainly.
MADem
Jun 2015
#9
Where did I say anything about giving equal weight? If a reporter goes to one source
MADem
Jun 2015
#46
People like to fight here on DU. I'd rather talk about what is happening in the world.
MADem
Jun 2015
#53
I think it was a piece of bloody, fatty meat tied to a line and thrown off the back of the boat.
MADem
Jun 2015
#56
I don't think the reform is all that much of a surprise, and I thought the timing had more to do
MADem
Jun 2015
#64
I agree with that, too. The oversight stunk on ice. There's a lot of entrenched idiocy.
MADem
Jun 2015
#66
They are covering something up or someone else in the complex web of private contractors
JDPriestly
Jun 2015
#78
The Chinese and Russians do it differently than we do--they put their hackers in uniform.
MADem
Jun 2015
#79
There is just some information that should not be placed on any computer system.
JDPriestly
Jun 2015
#80
If they KNOW that people are gonna play games and screw around, they should bite the bullet and
MADem
Jun 2015
#86
I totally agree. There is no excuse for the sloppiness involved in this scandal no matter
JDPriestly
Jun 2015
#88
Fact checking is fine, too. But it's more of a challenge when you agree to quote a source
MADem
Jun 2015
#35
Journalism 101: if you have only one unattributed source, Don't Go To Print with it.
truebluegreen
Jun 2015
#38
That hasn't been the standard for years. I don't think it would be a bad idea to go back to it,
MADem
Jun 2015
#49
No shit, end of discussion of who, what, when, where, why and for added value HOW!!!
mrdmk
Jun 2015
#84
Actually. They should be investigators. What people are saying are not necessarily facts.
Luminous Animal
Jun 2015
#12
Oh give it up. You were on the poopy-head band wagon until the reporter revealed himself
Luminous Animal
Jun 2015
#20
To pretend that reporters are objective, impartial and without an agenda is at best naive...nt
Jesus Malverde
Jun 2015
#30
I don't say they are. I say the ones that are worthy of any respect should strive for that ideal. nt
MADem
Jun 2015
#45
Well, your mind is made up and have a nice day. See you in Nov of next year--if you're still here.
MADem
Jun 2015
#87
I responded to what you wrote. If you managed to backtrack and revise that nonsense so what?
Warren Stupidity
Jun 2015
#93
Please read the full conversation, which took place a day before you decided to chime in.
MADem
Jun 2015
#95
I knew someone would be here to stick up for shitty reporting and sloppy propaganda.
DisgustipatedinCA
Jun 2015
#98
No idea what you're talking about, but my question was strictly a courtesy--no hidden meaning.
DisgustipatedinCA
Jun 2015
#100
Correct. Someone who simply hands readers what the government handed him or her is
merrily
Jun 2015
#5
And now, we have a law that says our government can propagandize us. Considering networks were
merrily
Jun 2015
#23
Now where is everyone who started screeching SNOWDEN TRAITOR(TM)!!! all over again?
daredtowork
Jun 2015
#22
Shouldn't we all trust our government? See GWB and IWR for solution to quiz.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jun 2015
#83