Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

kpete

(72,901 posts)
Tue Jun 16, 2015, 09:47 AM Jun 2015

CHARLES PIERCE: Things I Choose Not to Care About: Rachel Dolezal Edition [View all]

In which we discover that liberals waste a lot of time.
BY CHARLES P. PIERCE


Sherlock Holmes once pointed out that he only had so much room in the attic of his intellect and, therefore, he had to be careful about storing there only what he really needed. So it is in that spirit that I would like to say that I don't care very much what happens to Rachel Dolezal up there in Spokane. (A while back, I spent a week in Spokane, looking into the attempted bombing of the Martin Luther King Day parade there. I talked to dozens of people. I somehow missed Ms. Dolezal.) I don't care to involve myself in thought-experiments about her. I don't care to examine the role of "white privilege" in this situation. I don't want to help turn this thing into another exhausting exercise in sociological pilates. I do not choose to be involved in making what is little more than a very weird local news story into yet another totem representing Where We Are As A People. Let this woman fade away and spend your energy where it can do the most good. In the staggering welter of problems we have in this country regarding race, Rachel Dolezal's masquerade ought to be way down the list. I don't find it fascinating. I find it freaky in a carnival midway sort of way. The topic completely hijacked Thom Hartmann's radio show today. This stuff is catnip to liberals. I may never figure out why.

This, I might add, goes double for Caitlyn Jenner.

Go with god, Caitlin but, for the love of heaven, don't vote for Lindsey Graham.

http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a35720/rachel-dolezal-story/
24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Another exhausting exercise in sociological pilates." BeyondGeography Jun 2015 #1
Charlie can add me to the list of people who Greybnk48 Jun 2015 #2
+1 daleanime Jun 2015 #17
Exactly. Duppers Jun 2015 #21
Exactly! hunter Jun 2015 #3
Totally. More of the media examining its own fecal pellets. nt bemildred Jun 2015 #4
^^ LOL !! Perfect description ! ^^ nt eppur_se_muova Jun 2015 #15
one more here Romeo.lima333 Jun 2015 #5
"Freaky in a carnival midway sort of way" cwydro Jun 2015 #6
That's pretty much my take on things. Seems like the populace is always being shown > BlueJazz Jun 2015 #7
Charles Pierce nails it again. summerschild Jun 2015 #8
Sooooo Glad he wrote this - these are my sentiments exactly. dirtydickcheney Jun 2015 #9
K & R. n/t FSogol Jun 2015 #10
Couldn't agree more! ecstatic Jun 2015 #11
And yet, there he is writing about it. aikoaiko Jun 2015 #12
He's not writing about it he is writing about us. zeemike Jun 2015 #19
Sociological pilates. romanic Jun 2015 #13
It's keeping the racist trolls on DU busy RandiFan1290 Jun 2015 #14
I hate when this sort of gossip takes on the sanctimonious mask of social import RufusTFirefly Jun 2015 #16
Thank you, Charles skepticscott Jun 2015 #18
Ditto. drm604 Jun 2015 #20
Thanks for posting this, Kpete. Duppers Jun 2015 #22
Wow, that is one of the most appallingly stupid and childish things I've ever read. NuclearDem Jun 2015 #23
as I posted a couple weeks ago, the sjw waste enormous amounts of time and energy Doctor_J Jun 2015 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»CHARLES PIERCE: Things I ...