Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: There is a jaw dropping line in an article today- "President Barack Obama and his Republican allies" [View all]hifiguy
(33,688 posts)53. Boom.
In hindsight, it is exceedingly easy to see who he has been working for all the time - single payer/public option off the table and Big Insurance and Big Pharma invited to belly up to the bar first thing. Willingness to consider SS cuts to get a budget deal. Whatever happened to his promises to labor about the card checkoff? Baling out the banksters and doing squat to reform Wall Street. Now this.
Who he has actually been working for 80+% of the time would be obvious to Stevie Wonder.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
144 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
There is a jaw dropping line in an article today- "President Barack Obama and his Republican allies" [View all]
NRaleighLiberal
Jun 2015
OP
You have it all wrong they don't hate his guts, they hate his skin. But they all love the TPP. n/t
A Simple Game
Jun 2015
#35
My jaw is still firmly in place. No amount of speculation "in an article" makes my jaw move,
Fred Sanders
Jun 2015
#3
The republican base is not his "ally" in this or anything else. Only the Democratic base is. n/t
pampango
Jun 2015
#5
Whoa, wait: So Republicans are going to vote against him on this and Democrats
LondonReign2
Jun 2015
#23
If politicians listened to their bases that might happen. That is not the world we live in. n/t
pampango
Jun 2015
#25
The politicians from by part of my state listened and they voted NO. Northern MN.
jwirr
Jun 2015
#33
This poll is ridiculous. They never define any of the terms except to indicate Obama wants them.
hedda_foil
Jun 2015
#120
I have never blamed him for what he could not get through because the Rs did everything in the
jwirr
Jun 2015
#37
He squandered those precious first two years when he could have gotten things through.
L0oniX
Jun 2015
#96
And I agree with that but at the time I doubt that he understood the depth of the hatred that the
jwirr
Jun 2015
#117
On this there is 'bipartisanship' all around. The tea party was happy to see TAA and TPA die.
pampango
Jun 2015
#19
I suspect the tea party will claim ownership of the demise of TAA, not Democrats.
pampango
Jun 2015
#140
Buypartisanship. Where corporate interests purchase access to and influence
Ed Suspicious
Jun 2015
#36
what a laugh. where is the bipartisanship in things that we on the left want?
NRaleighLiberal
Jun 2015
#56
and you trust this why, esp. when Reich and Krugman, along with Warren and others, have a different
NRaleighLiberal
Jun 2015
#61
TPP is NOT a trade deal. It is an investment/outsourcing/corporate power grab deal.
Elwood P Dowd
Jun 2015
#69
And there is this about Citigroup sending it's executives to work in govt agencies to grease the
Elwood P Dowd
Jun 2015
#114
If you haven't been aware of this until now, you must have been asleep. also 'reply 16 in
Doctor_J
Jun 2015
#11
I've been well aware of it for a long long time. Just disappointing and deserving of being
NRaleighLiberal
Jun 2015
#57
I wish Democrats would ally with our Democratic President on the issue of trade.
tridim
Jun 2015
#12
I wish the president would ally with the large majority of democrats on this fiasco
Doctor_J
Jun 2015
#45
So you believe it is "good" that the Democrats are letting the GOP handle trade?
tridim
Jun 2015
#49
That is what you want, to pass FastTrack so that the TeaPubliKlans will have control of the
TheKentuckian
Jun 2015
#133
It will be more than that, this is the allotment for those who will qualify and jump the hoops.
TheKentuckian
Jun 2015
#134
You want smart people: Paul Krugman, Robert Reich, Joseph Stiglitz and many more economists.
jwirr
Jun 2015
#48
"Old" liberal Democrats like FDR, Truman and Kennedy pushed 'freer' trade and the institutions
pampango
Jun 2015
#22
LOL nice job turning the arguement upside down. Those old FDR trade agreements were about
jwirr
Jun 2015
#51
Great reply jwirr. The recent so called "free trade" deals are from another planet compared
Elwood P Dowd
Jun 2015
#70
"Those old FDR trade agreements" included the ITO which dealt with labor rights, investor protection
pampango
Jun 2015
#94
Notice that they did not include multi-national corporations profits and power. That is what I am
jwirr
Jun 2015
#116
The ITO did include "investment protection" in addition to labor standards, business regulation and
pampango
Jun 2015
#137
I have nothing against an insurance for investors as long as investors are also regulated. Otherwise
jwirr
Jun 2015
#141
I think back to the bailout of AIG. They were going broke because they were the insurance company
jwirr
Jun 2015
#143
So FDR and Truman were short-sighted and could not imagine a future world where Europe and Asia
pampango
Jun 2015
#139
Funny how Dems are always helpless against republicans even when they're the majority n/t
arcane1
Jun 2015
#58
Payback time for Jami & the bank boys! Happened also when the 'public option' was deleted from...
dmosh42
Jun 2015
#43
his new allies will do all they can to destroy his presidency first chance they get
samsingh
Jun 2015
#46
What US products, our war machines? What do we exactly manufacture? This is about lowering us to
mother earth
Jun 2015
#78
The US the worlds leader in weapons manufacture, it could stand a buzzcut!
Dont call me Shirley
Jun 2015
#79
We've got a whole troupe of apologists for this garbage, who, a few short years ago,
Marr
Jun 2015
#101
That is one utterly idiotic post, Nance - so what do you think is not correct?
NRaleighLiberal
Jun 2015
#111
It's Sharks vs. Jets for *you*, I know. Others are interested in policy, and are sick of
Marr
Jun 2015
#124
NAFTA was such a success, why wouldn't we want to repeat the experience?
the band leader
Jun 2015
#136