Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mopinko

(73,686 posts)
16. so stipulated.
Thu Jun 18, 2015, 01:06 PM
Jun 2015

i guess i am asking sort of a chicken and egg question.
but i honestly believe that daily parade of those caught up in drugs, all "other", is a big driver of the current state of racial frenzy.
after all, we know that the modern frenzy was, in fact, certainly at least arguably the direct result of an act of the cia.
was discrediting the black community what they were really doing, or was that just a happy accident for the promulgators of the southern strategy?
and were they also conspiring with the wealthy few who owned the teevee machine to pummel us with images of dangerous black people? or blood and guts and the siren song of fear?

and whether intentional or not, is it not a driver of the rabid paranoia we see every day?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

it was dying out in the 60's and 70's? Seriously? NightWatcher Jun 2015 #1
well, perhaps too strong of a word. mopinko Jun 2015 #4
The Drug Warrior in Chief is African American, and so is the Attorney General (and her predecessor) Romulox Jun 2015 #2
The war on drugs was started because of racism, back in the 1920's I believe. Kalidurga Jun 2015 #3
how much of that was meant to divide and conquer? mopinko Jun 2015 #5
I have no idea Kalidurga Jun 2015 #7
Especially anti-cannabis laws. WDIM Jun 2015 #6
Ronald Reagan is a big part of the upswing in racism gollygee Jun 2015 #8
it's the part that was on the teevee and the front pages mopinko Jun 2015 #9
Then there was his campaign launch in Philadelphia, MS KamaAina Jun 2015 #21
madness Mr Dixon Jun 2015 #10
but what i am saying is- has it lead to an increase in racism? mopinko Jun 2015 #11
IMO Mr Dixon Jun 2015 #14
Thirty Years Ago, I Would Have Said "A Lot" ProfessorGAC Jun 2015 #12
agreed. mopinko Jun 2015 #13
The WOD and racism have been entertwined since the WOD started in earnest a century ago. Eleanors38 Jun 2015 #15
so stipulated. mopinko Jun 2015 #16
The Democratic Party was and is easily cowed by "Soft on [anything]!" Eleanors38 Jun 2015 #17
How much does it all have as a goal stopping understanding between groups in the USA to protect applegrove Jun 2015 #18
exactly mopinko Jun 2015 #19
I don't think it has anything to do with the cia. applegrove Jun 2015 #22
we now know that they started the crack epidemic. mopinko Jun 2015 #23
it's more the other way around JI7 Jun 2015 #20
like i said, chicken and egg. mopinko Jun 2015 #24
K & R !!! WillyT Jun 2015 #25
It is a big factor in the law enforcement piece. Ending the stupid and failed drug war wouldn't make TheKentuckian Jun 2015 #26
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»how much does the war on ...»Reply #16