Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LeftishBrit

(41,453 posts)
45. 'Anthony Migchels for Henry Makow'?
Mon May 14, 2012, 04:54 PM
May 2012

Have you any idea who these people are, or how truly evil they are?

Migchels is a big poster of crap about the 'Illuminati', and is blatantly antisemitic. See (if you can stand it) an article that he wrote on the blog hercolano2, entitled 'Yes, the money power is Jewish; and full of nuttery about 'Jewish supremacism'.

Makow is also antisemitic, and is also sexist, racist, homophobic and right-wing in every possible way. His articles - which I discovered through a link to whale.to that someone 'helpfully' posted a couple of years ago, include such lovely titles as:

The Illuminati Conspiracy against God

The Devil's Work: Feminism and the Elite Depopulation Agenda

How I became a Mensch: After Feminism Stole my Identity T

The CIA, Homosexuality and Underdevelopment

Does a Satanic Cult Rule the World?

"Protocols of Zion" is the NWO Blueprint


And one called "Tolerance": A Devious Attack on Your Identity

including such lines as:


"
For centuries the Masonic central bankers who control Western society and culture have been pushing "tolerance." Why?

...The four major collective forces are: Race, Religion, Family and Nation. They are the four pillars of our human identity.

How do you undermine them? Certainly a frontal attack would meet with spirited resistance. Instead you promote "tolerance" which destroys these collective forces by erasing the differences between them...


ZERO TOLERANCE FOR HETEROSEXUALS

In the one-race, one-religion, one-world government, we are to have one sex as well. The bankers are creating a homosexual society by blurring the line between masculine and feminine...



Some psychologists protested this banker takeover. One was Ray Johnson, who wrote that the APA "has been seized by political activists who have little regard for science or the democratic process. Since the seventies, the American Psychological Association has lobbied the government, filed court briefs, and engaged in and promoted boycotts on behalf of ..the ERA, unrestricted abortion (including abortion for children without parental notification and consent), sex and racial-ethnic discrimination, and homosexual politics."'



Very suitable for progressive consumption, I don't think!


And as regards the specific content: bad as most of the banks are, a sudden run on the banks usually has less than brilliant consequences for the economy, as shown by several occasions in history.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Someone who doesn't believe money is a concept. nt CK_John May 2012 #1
Yes by all means let's all create credit dmallind May 2012 #2
Must be a banker....if you read the entire post you will understand more about.... MindMover May 2012 #3
Your words pally "anybody can...." dmallind May 2012 #35
No. I bank with a small vermont bank that is run responsibly cali May 2012 #4
3-1, 5-1, 7-1. 10-1.......? MindMover May 2012 #22
"Banking is part of the Babylon Mystery " sufrommich May 2012 #5
It's a mystery to me :) - n/t coalition_unwilling May 2012 #6
Post removed Post removed May 2012 #7
Ah, The Rothschilds, of course. sufrommich May 2012 #25
Agreed that most conspiracy theories are more than laughable..... MindMover May 2012 #27
You post anti semitic crap here and sufrommich May 2012 #33
So is everything about banks anti Semitic crap....? MindMover May 2012 #36
No, not everything is, but your crap is. nt sufrommich May 2012 #38
Not just the Rothschilds NoPasaran May 2012 #39
There may or may not be reasons to avoid banking Vanje May 2012 #32
I've been reading this stuff since the seventies bhikkhu May 2012 #8
You evidently are writing from a secure and safe position.... MindMover May 2012 #9
What if you don't have money? DainBramaged May 2012 #10
Bartering will be part of the new paradigm..... MindMover May 2012 #11
(sigh) DainBramaged May 2012 #17
Doom and gloom is a video game isn't it...? MindMover May 2012 #19
No, the bank did not create that money when they issued the mortgage jeff47 May 2012 #12
We are the depositors and the Fed..... MindMover May 2012 #13
Yes. They act as money concentrators. jeff47 May 2012 #14
Which right now, they are not issuing a lot of mortgages.... MindMover May 2012 #15
Because they haven't worked through all the foreclosures yet. jeff47 May 2012 #28
Hooray for dollar devaluation! Seriously. Zalatix May 2012 #16
To some extent, I believe you are correct in your assumptions... MindMover May 2012 #18
They won't have a choice. Zalatix May 2012 #20
So because the dollar is "relatively" strong now....and... MindMover May 2012 #21
Wages will go down relative to inflation but will go up due to increased demand for labor. Zalatix May 2012 #41
My money is staying in the bank. RebelOne May 2012 #23
Safer in a bank....? MindMover May 2012 #24
As long as the deposits are below the FDIC limit, then it's safe in the bank. (nt) jeff47 May 2012 #29
Tin-foil Liberturdian BS. Odin2005 May 2012 #26
Who posted "Jewish Bankers" first.....? MindMover May 2012 #30
another poster mentioned that this idiot rants about the Rothschilds. Odin2005 May 2012 #34
Thank you Lord, "most people are not pregnant"....just because I am..... MindMover May 2012 #40
If your beef is not about Jewish bankers then I say we simply drop this Jewish banker talk. Zalatix May 2012 #42
My friend's elderly sister and husband just died - had tens of thousands in cash adigal May 2012 #31
And how much they didn't gain.... dmallind May 2012 #37
I don't know, my husband's 401 lost 1/2 of its value in 2008 adigal May 2012 #43
Yes of course a rush on the banks!!! I mean what can go wrong? Well other than what happened in 1929 cstanleytech May 2012 #44
'Anthony Migchels for Henry Makow'? LeftishBrit May 2012 #45
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This message was self-del...»Reply #45