Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Watch out, no mourning for the dead allowed [View all]bettyellen
(47,209 posts)57. Quick to anger, eh? Awesome.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
190 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yes, like a televangelist barking at you to put your hands on the TV set . . .
hatrack
Jun 2015
#103
I posted about my grieving for the lost and of course got the usual from the gun
CTyankee
Jun 2015
#5
So emotionally attacking gun owners is an appropriate response on such an occasion?
hack89
Jun 2015
#24
Sadness, and anger with gunners are both totally reasonable and can and should exist simultaneously
HERVEPA
Jun 2015
#26
Well i may or may not have anything intelligent to say. I leve you all to judge that.
hrmjustin
Jun 2015
#34
I assure you as a gay man who has fought all my life for my rights that I understand how
hrmjustin
Jun 2015
#63
Maybe because you agree with not allowing citizens the right to have these arms.
hrmjustin
Jun 2015
#98
But someone involved in a civil rights struggle should surely know the criteria for restrictions. nt
X_Digger
Jun 2015
#104
I favor the Clinton ban on assault weapons. Should never had been allowed to expire.
hrmjustin
Jun 2015
#106
Right.. it resulted in turning over congress to the Repugnicans and increased AR-15 sales.
X_Digger
Jun 2015
#107
So you're for selling more of them? (You do realize that the 'ban' was cosmetic, right?)
X_Digger
Jun 2015
#111
Anything that spews out a lot of bullets in a second or two should likely be banned.
hrmjustin
Jun 2015
#116
Every. Single. Time controllers poison the well with unending bans and controls.
Eleanors38
Jun 2015
#178
Or all perfectly fine ways to express frustration over those who feel innocent deaths...
LanternWaste
Jun 2015
#153
Coverage of the terrorist attack in Charleston is smoke and mirrors, because
MerryBlooms
Jun 2015
#11
Well, I alerted on it, but it had already survived 2-5. At least my effort means it gets....
Hekate
Jun 2015
#70
There is nothing wrong and everything right with using horrific events as calls to action
etherealtruth
Jun 2015
#22
A massacre in Australia spurred them to sensible gun control that has worked....tragedies
Fred Sanders
Jun 2015
#37
You can say bullshit all you want, that doesn't change the fact that what you claim
GGJohn
Jun 2015
#144
More accurately, "isn't supported by what you yourself may or may not have seen."
LanternWaste
Jun 2015
#163
She was asked to provide links to any pro 2A threads started since the massacre in SC,
GGJohn
Jun 2015
#164
If it's as bullshit as you claim it is, kindly provide some links to those posts
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2015
#145
You linked to another thread, with no quotes from any posts therein. Try again
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2015
#172
Actually, people are free to kill. Consequences of that action however, are another thing.
LanternWaste
Jun 2015
#154
Tell that to the little kid who shot his friend with the loaded gun he found in daddy's dresser.
Dont call me Shirley
Jun 2015
#165