Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Watch out, no mourning for the dead allowed [View all]hack89
(39,181 posts)58. That is not an answer
if people like me are not harming others with them, what is the point in taking them away from us?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
190 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yes, like a televangelist barking at you to put your hands on the TV set . . .
hatrack
Jun 2015
#103
I posted about my grieving for the lost and of course got the usual from the gun
CTyankee
Jun 2015
#5
So emotionally attacking gun owners is an appropriate response on such an occasion?
hack89
Jun 2015
#24
Sadness, and anger with gunners are both totally reasonable and can and should exist simultaneously
HERVEPA
Jun 2015
#26
Well i may or may not have anything intelligent to say. I leve you all to judge that.
hrmjustin
Jun 2015
#34
I assure you as a gay man who has fought all my life for my rights that I understand how
hrmjustin
Jun 2015
#63
Maybe because you agree with not allowing citizens the right to have these arms.
hrmjustin
Jun 2015
#98
But someone involved in a civil rights struggle should surely know the criteria for restrictions. nt
X_Digger
Jun 2015
#104
I favor the Clinton ban on assault weapons. Should never had been allowed to expire.
hrmjustin
Jun 2015
#106
Right.. it resulted in turning over congress to the Repugnicans and increased AR-15 sales.
X_Digger
Jun 2015
#107
So you're for selling more of them? (You do realize that the 'ban' was cosmetic, right?)
X_Digger
Jun 2015
#111
Anything that spews out a lot of bullets in a second or two should likely be banned.
hrmjustin
Jun 2015
#116
Every. Single. Time controllers poison the well with unending bans and controls.
Eleanors38
Jun 2015
#178
Or all perfectly fine ways to express frustration over those who feel innocent deaths...
LanternWaste
Jun 2015
#153
Coverage of the terrorist attack in Charleston is smoke and mirrors, because
MerryBlooms
Jun 2015
#11
Well, I alerted on it, but it had already survived 2-5. At least my effort means it gets....
Hekate
Jun 2015
#70
There is nothing wrong and everything right with using horrific events as calls to action
etherealtruth
Jun 2015
#22
A massacre in Australia spurred them to sensible gun control that has worked....tragedies
Fred Sanders
Jun 2015
#37
You can say bullshit all you want, that doesn't change the fact that what you claim
GGJohn
Jun 2015
#144
More accurately, "isn't supported by what you yourself may or may not have seen."
LanternWaste
Jun 2015
#163
She was asked to provide links to any pro 2A threads started since the massacre in SC,
GGJohn
Jun 2015
#164
If it's as bullshit as you claim it is, kindly provide some links to those posts
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2015
#145
You linked to another thread, with no quotes from any posts therein. Try again
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2015
#172
Actually, people are free to kill. Consequences of that action however, are another thing.
LanternWaste
Jun 2015
#154
Tell that to the little kid who shot his friend with the loaded gun he found in daddy's dresser.
Dont call me Shirley
Jun 2015
#165