Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I don't understand the South. [View all]Pooka Fey
(3,496 posts)67. Japan's revisionism re WWII and denial of WWII crimes is well known
From May 14, 2013 article, U.S. News & World Report: Japan's Dangerous World War II Attitude - Japan's World War II revisionism is distracting from urgent economic reforms.
http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/noah-kristula-green/2013/05/14/japans-dangerous-revisionist-world-war-ii-attitude
Germany faced the evil of its actions in WWII. Japan has not yet done so, and 70 years have passed.
So it does not help the nation's standing when Japanese politicians make revisionist comments about Japan's actions during World War II, and deny the aggressive actions of the war-era government.
Japan has had a difficult time reckoning with the crimes it committed during World War II. Historians have suggested numerous reasons for this: some argue that Cold War-era politics meant there was less pressure from America to get Japan to face up to its ugly past. Others argue that since Shintoism (the dominant Japanese faith) eschews making moral judgements of the dead, it is harder for the Japanese to condemn their ancestors.
Japan has had a difficult time reckoning with the crimes it committed during World War II. Historians have suggested numerous reasons for this: some argue that Cold War-era politics meant there was less pressure from America to get Japan to face up to its ugly past. Others argue that since Shintoism (the dominant Japanese faith) eschews making moral judgements of the dead, it is harder for the Japanese to condemn their ancestors.
On a televised policy debate on May 12, the Liberal Democratic Party's own policy chief argued that the prime minister did not agree with the findings of the Tokyo War Crimes tribunal, forcing Japan's top spokesman to issue another round of pushback arguing that this was not the government's official view.
http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/noah-kristula-green/2013/05/14/japans-dangerous-revisionist-world-war-ii-attitude
Germany faced the evil of its actions in WWII. Japan has not yet done so, and 70 years have passed.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
119 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
And if Germany was still proudly flying swastikas, that would be somewhat problematic,
DanTex
Jun 2015
#47
Exactly. My point entirely...I've been thinking...do the Germans have special sections
CTyankee
Jun 2015
#99
How could Lincoln have been too conciliatory after the war if he was killed before it was over?
KitSileya
Jun 2015
#29
Plans for reconstruction were well underway at the time of his assasination
LordGlenconner
Jun 2015
#32
You must dig ISIS. In the ME, they're doing what you advocate for in this post.
Pooka Fey
Jun 2015
#57
Native Southerner here. Haley and Jindal are about nothing but lining their pockets.
onehandle
Jun 2015
#11
thanks I've spent some time in the deep South, but confess to feeling uncomfortable
cali
Jun 2015
#14
Yes, that is so true but they are not the only Americans who lost wars. Native Americans did also
jwirr
Jun 2015
#35
The operative word is "before the European" They did not lose a war because they wanted to
jwirr
Jun 2015
#93
Most people that I see obsessing about the civil war are northerners. nt
redgreenandblue
Jun 2015
#19
You may be right but this kid said it was about racism and wanting to start a new race war. That
jwirr
Jun 2015
#39
Not really. There are similar movements in Idaho and Montana, hardly the South.
Behind the Aegis
Jun 2015
#44
"Most"? Would you agree that democracy tends to reflect collective attitudes?
lumberjack_jeff
Jun 2015
#30
You don't understand it because you buy into the silly South bashing we partake in here on DU.
ileus
Jun 2015
#41
What South do you live in? I live in a South that is still seething with anger
McCamy Taylor
Jun 2015
#43
Yeah, I miss that guy so much. If you haven't read his essays, I think his blog is still
Nay
Jun 2015
#65
I grew up exposed to that whole rebel pride thing, but luckily wasn't raised by it.
arcane1
Jun 2015
#51
In my family is refered, when it is discussed, as the"War between the States".
oneshooter
Jun 2015
#103
+1. Jindahl and Haley are easy, racism is what it usually takes to get elected statewide there..
Hoyt
Jun 2015
#55
There's lots of icky racists in the north, too. But there's more of them per capita in the south.
Zorra
Jun 2015
#58
Jindal and Haley certainly DO understand it, they just care about their own political ambitions more
JI7
Jun 2015
#59
I was born in NC and do not understand the south. my folks were adamant about everyone being equal
peacebird
Jun 2015
#76
The "Civil War." The Poverty that happened after Reconstruction when Lincoln was Assassinated.
KoKo
Jun 2015
#89
Particularly considering that Southern Baptists have used the Bible to support
csziggy
Jun 2015
#110