General Discussion

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)

17. That person asked a perfectly reasonable question.

Sun Jun 21, 2015, 02:41 PM

Jun 2015

You made an irrelevant reply about the source of the info you presented and told him to get lost. You then doubled down on the non-responsive dismissal before the seemingly-inevitable (and justifiably hidden) small penis blurt.

That hardly demonstrates interest in any sort of "discussion" at all, adult or otherwise. If you just want to insult gun owners, fine...but may I respectfully suggest the Gun Control Reform Activism "safe haven" group for that. You might still get alerted on, but most gun-owning DU'ers don't bother visiting that group, so you're probably okay.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

30 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Post removed [View all] Post removed Jun 2015 OP

no your post got hidden as it was just plain insulting Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #1

DUer Enthusiast, to whom it was addressed, did not appear to be insulted. Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #2

That's a little disingenuous to say the post was directed at Enthusiast mythology Jun 2015 #8

Gun enthusiasts in general, of whom I grant you, there are many on DU. Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #14

Thus the very reasonable hide. Lizzie Poppet Jun 2015 #27

And this thread is meant as a mea culpa. Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #28

A very poor non-apology Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #29

Of course. Because people who object to your sexist rant wouldn't realize that they are synonyms. lumberjack_jeff Jun 2015 #3

You mean the documentary references? Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #5

Your original reference, in the hidden post, had nothing to do with symbolism. Lizzie Poppet Jun 2015 #20

Other than meta, here's how I characterize this post... cherokeeprogressive Jun 2015 #4

Point taken! Derision is a powerful and legitimate rhetorical device. Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #6

Less crude but no more valid. Lizzie Poppet Jun 2015 #7

'Actual adult discussion'--that's what I thought was going on Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #10

That person asked a perfectly reasonable question. Lizzie Poppet Jun 2015 #17

Read the rest of said poster's interventions in that thread. Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #23

I did. Lizzie Poppet Jun 2015 #30

Could you link this data? sarisataka Jun 2015 #9

Sorry? Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #12

You said you mentioned sarisataka Jun 2015 #24

Google is your friend... Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #26

You crossed the line HassleCat Jun 2015 #11

Watch out HC. Don't want a lock. Please replace the offending phrase with "such terms". Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #13

That's true HassleCat Jun 2015 #15

I'm curuous. Snobblevitch Jun 2015 #18

Read the referenced articles. Then get back to me. Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #19

I looked at two of them. I still don't get the connection, other than insults. Snobblevitch Jun 2015 #22

Connect the dots. You can do it... Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #25

well i agree with the hidden note. trueblue2007 Jun 2015 #16

Really? You agree with that? Lizzie Poppet Jun 2015 #21