Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Post removed [View all]
 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
27. Thus the very reasonable hide.
Sun Jun 21, 2015, 02:57 PM
Jun 2015

You insulted multiple DU'ers (as well as millions of Democrats) with that nonsense.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Post removed [View all] Post removed Jun 2015 OP
no your post got hidden as it was just plain insulting Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #1
DUer Enthusiast, to whom it was addressed, did not appear to be insulted. Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #2
That's a little disingenuous to say the post was directed at Enthusiast mythology Jun 2015 #8
Gun enthusiasts in general, of whom I grant you, there are many on DU. Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #14
Thus the very reasonable hide. Lizzie Poppet Jun 2015 #27
And this thread is meant as a mea culpa. Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #28
A very poor non-apology Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #29
Of course. Because people who object to your sexist rant wouldn't realize that they are synonyms. lumberjack_jeff Jun 2015 #3
You mean the documentary references? Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #5
Your original reference, in the hidden post, had nothing to do with symbolism. Lizzie Poppet Jun 2015 #20
Other than meta, here's how I characterize this post... cherokeeprogressive Jun 2015 #4
Point taken! Derision is a powerful and legitimate rhetorical device. Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #6
Less crude but no more valid. Lizzie Poppet Jun 2015 #7
'Actual adult discussion'--that's what I thought was going on Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #10
That person asked a perfectly reasonable question. Lizzie Poppet Jun 2015 #17
Read the rest of said poster's interventions in that thread. Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #23
I did. Lizzie Poppet Jun 2015 #30
Could you link this data? sarisataka Jun 2015 #9
Sorry? Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #12
You said you mentioned sarisataka Jun 2015 #24
Google is your friend... Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #26
You crossed the line HassleCat Jun 2015 #11
Watch out HC. Don't want a lock. Please replace the offending phrase with "such terms". Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #13
That's true HassleCat Jun 2015 #15
I'm curuous. Snobblevitch Jun 2015 #18
Read the referenced articles. Then get back to me. Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #19
I looked at two of them. I still don't get the connection, other than insults. Snobblevitch Jun 2015 #22
Connect the dots. You can do it... Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #25
well i agree with the hidden note. trueblue2007 Jun 2015 #16
Really? You agree with that? Lizzie Poppet Jun 2015 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Post removed»Reply #27