Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Raine1967

(11,693 posts)
6. K&R!
Sun Jun 21, 2015, 10:29 PM
Jun 2015

I have a strong feeling this ail be met with much disapproval, but I happen to agree with all of it.

Instead, the PUBs and professional left instead targeted “Blue Dogs,” falsely claiming that they were responsible for the inaction of the Democratic Congress. It was complete crap on several levels. First of all, only one member of the Blue Dog caucus did not vote with Democrats at least 80% of the time. Most of them voted with Democrats more than 85% of the time and many of those targeted topped 90%. Even the one Blue Dog who didn’t vote with Democrats 80% of the time did so Democrats 68% of the time. At no time during the 111th Congress did any Blue Dog block a Democratic bill or vote against cloture. Never. Didn’t happen. But there is one other thing; no Blue Dog ever cast a deciding vote against a Democratic bill, including the Affordable Care Act. The fact is, Blue Dogs, who represent conservative districts, coordinated with Speaker Pelosi, so they could demonstrate a “no” vote at home while making sure the bill passed. And it did.

And before you scream at me and call me a liar, go look it up. I have. As bad as some Blue Dog rhetoric is at times, the people who replaced them are far more odious. Yet PUBs and pro lefties continue to brag that they have “purged” almost the entire Blue Dog Caucus from Congress. Strangely, the same people don’t take credit for helping create the Tea Party Caucus, despite the fact that every Blue Dog “purged” was replaced with a teabagger. How can a “progressive” brag about replacing Democrats who vote 80% of the time or more with teabaggers who vote with Democrats 0% of the time?

It’s just a fact. The worst Blue Dog in Congress was about 80X better than the person who replaced them when PUBs targeted them. The problem comes because too many progressives put far more value in rhetoric than results. They are so enamored with what politicians say, they refuse to consider what they do. They’re the very definition of gullible. If a politician tells you he’s going to bring peace, kill all defense programs, quadruple spending on programs for the poor and flip us over to a single player health plan, and you buy that bullshit and trash anyone who doesn’t say all that, you’re not politically savvy, you’re a gullible fool. Campaign promises are wish lists; they still need a majority in Congress to happen, and I guarantee that none of the above will happen when you target Blue Dogs and replace them with teabaggers.

I’m not talking about primaries. During primaries, support anyone you want, without trashing the other candidates, in case they win. And then, if your candidate loses in the primary, you don’t run off and sulk in the corner; you support the living shit out of the best candidate left, which right now will always be a Democrat. Always. Every time.





Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Reaching for the popcorn nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #1
Waiter! AtomicKitten Jun 2015 #5
Thankee nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #16
Me too but this is my kind of tub SaranchaIsWaiting Jun 2015 #14
It does fit nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #17
Pass the garlic butter please! Initech Jun 2015 #18
Here nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #20
Cool MFrohike Jun 2015 #2
The Third Way needs to go MannyGoldstein Jun 2015 #3
Obama is not Third Way BainsBane Jun 2015 #39
Actually the bail out of the banks was paid by the Obama adminstration Thinkingabout Jun 2015 #4
K&R! Raine1967 Jun 2015 #6
That's funny MFrohike Jun 2015 #7
maybe you missed this part: Raine1967 Jun 2015 #8
Don't let the facts get in the way of a good story MFrohike Jun 2015 #9
You are more then entitled to dismiss the entire piece because of your feeling Raine1967 Jun 2015 #10
Hahahahahahaha MFrohike Jun 2015 #11
It's not "the author who is full of shit".. Mahalo Raine! Cha Jun 2015 #27
It's not much, but Jamaal510 Jun 2015 #12
Jamaal. sheshe2 Jun 2015 #15
Success in politics is all about what you don't say. lumberjack_jeff Jun 2015 #13
If florid words is all you got, you weren't listening. sheshe2 Jun 2015 #19
Well, maybe Obama could have started his presidency on a higher note than Betty Karlson Jun 2015 #21
Hey Betty. sheshe2 Jun 2015 #22
I watched it all right. Dont feel sad for me yet. Betty Karlson Jun 2015 #23
It's so easy to spot those who appreciate nothing that's happened over the last 7 years, she.. Cha Jun 2015 #28
Just a casual observation wyldwolf Jun 2015 #24
Excellent quote from Eleanor Roosevelt.. Thank you, wlldwolf! Cha Jun 2015 #25
Wow, great quote. MBS Jun 2015 #31
Milt Shook's Please Cut The Crap is one of my favorite sites.. thank you, she.. Cha Jun 2015 #26
There was so much great things in the article, Cha. sheshe2 Jun 2015 #33
The Obama Admin has been amazing.. not perfect but on the whole I've been so appreciative! Cha Jun 2015 #34
I must be tripping... Did you actually write the following with a straight face? Bonobo Jun 2015 #29
The sad part about the Obama term is not that he didn't accomplish more tularetom Jun 2015 #30
If prosecuting soulless torture and depravity tears the nation apart then that is what is needed TheKentuckian Jun 2015 #32
Then you have those who have no clue what went on and are whining he didn't even try.. the hardest Cha Jun 2015 #35
Yup. sheshe2 Jun 2015 #36
I didn't read it, either.. it's obvious from the get.. they don't know wtf they're talking about. Cha Jun 2015 #37
blah blah blah sheshe2 Jun 2015 #38
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Getting Smarter About Pol...»Reply #6