Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
Mon Jun 22, 2015, 09:34 PM Jun 2015

If TPP passes, kiss your generic drugs goodbye [View all]

The Trans-Pacific Partnership, Drug Patents and President Clinton
Monday, 22 June 2015 00:00 * By Dean Baker * Truthout | Op-Ed

There are many serious issues raised by the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), but the one that may have the greatest long-term impact is its provisions on drug patents. The explicit purpose is to make patent protection stronger and longer. While these provisions are likely to lead to higher drug prices in the United States, they will have their greatest impact in the developing world.

In most developing countries drugs are far cheaper than in the United States. This is especially the case in India. The country has a world-class generic industry that produces high quality drugs that typically sell for a small fraction of the price in the United States. For example, the generic version of the Hepatitis C drug Sovaldi can be purchased in India for less than $1,000 a treatment. The patent protected version sells in the United States for $84,000.

The US drug industry desperately wants to eliminate this sort of price gap, which can exceed a ratio of one hundred to one. While India is not in the TPP, the goal of TPP proponents is to expand the pact over time so that India would eventually be included and therefore be subject to its strong patent rules.

This should have everyone very worried. The patent system is a horribly outmoded method of financing research that dates from the 15th century. The idea is that the government provides an incentive for innovation by giving the inventor a patent monopoly over use of the innovation for a period of time. This is problematic for the all the reasons that government enforced monopolies are generally a bad idea, but the problems in the case of prescription drugs are especially serious.

More: http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/31492-the-trans-pacific-partnership-drug-patents-and-president-clinton
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
India will never do it... they control a good % the markets in MENA and Africa JCMach1 Jun 2015 #1
I'd rather not take that chance, if India changes its mind 99th_Monkey Jun 2015 #6
No kidding, the TPP is bad in sooooo many ways... Americans are extorted for medications JCMach1 Jun 2015 #17
I don't understand why that would make a difference within the US pnwmom Jun 2015 #2
It radically extends life of patents, rather than of patients 99th_Monkey Jun 2015 #4
The so-called loop-hole has nothing to do with the TPP Ms. Toad Jun 2015 #11
WikiLeaks exposes "sweet deals for Big Pharma" TPP just makes an already bad situation worse 99th_Monkey Jun 2015 #15
Drug companies already do this minute tweaking of ingredients. blue neen Jun 2015 #12
please see 99th_Monkey Jun 2015 #16
From what I can tell, blue neen Jun 2015 #18
True, it mainly screws other nation's people more than US 99th_Monkey Jun 2015 #21
I can't understand how ANY Democrat would want the TPA to pass. marym625 Jun 2015 #3
It's truly bizarro world Art_from_Ark Jun 2015 #7
You said it! marym625 Jun 2015 #8
All generic drugs will be confiscated in 24 business hours. tritsofme Jun 2015 #5
In many poor countries, name brand drugs are cheaper than generics here. In any event, Hoyt Jun 2015 #9
TPP allows Big Pharma to extend patents on dubious grounds 99th_Monkey Jun 2015 #13
How is this different than what Big Pharma does now? blue neen Jun 2015 #14
Exactly, it's not different. I don't like the practice, though. Hoyt Jun 2015 #19
The practice is known as "evergreening". blue neen Jun 2015 #20
By itself, this is more than sufficient reason to reject Fast Track. Faryn Balyncd Jun 2015 #10
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If TPP passes, kiss your ...