General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Hillary Clinton is going to lose: She doesn’t even see the frustrated progressive wave [View all]PBass
(1,537 posts)A campaign kickoff event is certainly not the time or place to dig into policy details and positions on current events. There will be plenty of time for specifics later. We already know where Clinton stands on many issues (women's reproductive rights, health care reform, etc). George Lakoff says that Democrats lose elections when campaigning if they get bogged down in wonk-level details about policy, rather than creating a positive image... "Values trump issues". (You guys DO want to win, don't you?) The Salon article criticizes David Axelrod for taking this 'values over issues' approach with Obama's campaign (and Clinton for doing the same) but Obama won (!!!) while the big wonky policy campaigns by Al Gore ("Al Bore"
and John Kerry (he's so stuffy!) LOST. (I know Gore technically won, but he should have demolished Dumbya, it shouldn't have been even close, except Gore ran a bad campaign).
Good article by George Lakoff linked below (a little confusing, as the bullet points describe what Democrats do wrong... and then he corrects each point with the bolded text). It bears repeating... wonky conversations about policy details seem sexy to to us at DU - gosh that Al Gore seems smart, and Bush seems so dumb! - but they don't win presidential elections. Elections are won by the person who seems the most sincere and likable (which is why Republicans attack Clinton on the likability and sincerity angles) and candidates who have good values. It's NOT a contest to see who can dig the deepest on policy, that just turns people off - the average person doesn't follow politics that closely, and just wants somebody they trust to handle everything so they can concentrate on making dinner.
http://georgelakoff.com/2014/11/13/democratic-strategies-lost-big-heres-why-and-how-to-fix-it/