Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So, TPP Fast Track has passed. RIP American Middle Class [View all]Buns_of_Fire
(19,018 posts)104. I know it's not finalized. There's been to reason to, with the possibility
that TPA might not pass, which would effectively kill the whole thing. But it won't take long to put the final few layers of polish on and buff it to a fine luster.
Republican senator Jeff Sessions, from Alabama, wrote an open letter on Monday to senators in his party calling on them to vote against the bill and pointed to remarks made by Mr Robb <the Australian Trade Minister> last week in an interview with Australian broadcaster ABC.
Mr Robb said, "We are literally one week of negotiation away from completing this extraordinary deal across 12 countries and 40 per cent of the world's GDP."
...
"The Australian trade minister has unintentionally debunked the idea that TPP is somehow only in the planning stages," Senator Sessions wrote.
"Some members of congress conditioned their votes on assurances that the (Obama) administration would form the agreement based on the vague, non-binding 'negotiating objectives' in fast-track.
Mr Robb said, "We are literally one week of negotiation away from completing this extraordinary deal across 12 countries and 40 per cent of the world's GDP."
...
"The Australian trade minister has unintentionally debunked the idea that TPP is somehow only in the planning stages," Senator Sessions wrote.
"Some members of congress conditioned their votes on assurances that the (Obama) administration would form the agreement based on the vague, non-binding 'negotiating objectives' in fast-track.
https://au.finance.yahoo.com/news/aust-minister-robb-may-scuttled-025106161.html
I don't know where Sessions got the idea it was only in the planning stages, since they've been working on it for ten years or so.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
164 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I really want you to know, I am against the TPP. But: I am trying to figure this out.
Raine1967
Jun 2015
#93
Raine, my understanding is that the TPA passed by the Senate requires the final agreement to be made
Hoyt
Jun 2015
#138
That is an important distinction, final deal passed v. negotiations & draft texts.
99th_Monkey
Jun 2015
#162
I wouldn't put the birth of the middle class as 1920. republicans created huge inequality
pampango
Jun 2015
#7
Much wealth was created in the 1920's but, just like today, most went to the 1%.
pampango
Jun 2015
#10
Fucking sick of you characterizing concerns as whining. God damned sick of it.
Enthusiast
Jun 2015
#31
Buy-partisanship. It's beautiful, for the CEO Party, Investor Class and Transnational Corporations.
appalachiablue
Jun 2015
#114
To this issue, yes. But Reagan killed the middle class with his tax policies and anti union
randys1
Jun 2015
#52
Is Obama a Republican? Is that a rhetorial joke? Help me out here why Obama pushed for this TPP.
WinkyDink
Jun 2015
#61
It's worth mentioning that 6 of the 13 had previously voted for both NAFTA and CAFTA, and that
Bluenorthwest
Jun 2015
#115
Money buys phony "campaigns" that mean NOTHING for elections that mean NOTHING. Politics is now seen
WinkyDink
Jun 2015
#58
When are the global corporations and Wall Street going to start officially paying
raindaddy
Jun 2015
#60
The only thing that could be more obvious than the post-presidency payoff to the Clintons
hifiguy
Jun 2015
#70
First, its not a treaty. Calling it an agreement is how they bypass the two thirds requirement.
Elwood P Dowd
Jun 2015
#79
I know it's not finalized. There's been to reason to, with the possibility
Buns_of_Fire
Jun 2015
#104
I can't remember who it was that kept saying in his last term we would see the real
Autumn
Jun 2015
#65
The most dangerous hyperbole is coming from the Wall Street crowd pushing TPP.
Elwood P Dowd
Jun 2015
#157
Really great post, but the title is wrong. It isn't too late to correct it.
RiverLover
Jun 2015
#110