Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MADem

(135,425 posts)
34. He didn't try to break away from the country in order to preserve the institution of slavery.
Wed Jun 24, 2015, 02:43 PM
Jun 2015

It wasn't an issue that rose to the level of civil strife fracturing a nation during his lifetime. That's the distinction and the difference.

It's time for some honesty on this topic, and with any luck, this sleazy flag will help to open the discussion about our actual "American heritage." America needs to own the fact that the country was built on slavery--hell, the WHITE House was built by BLACK men, and they didn't have a choice in the matter, either.

In point of fact, more than half of his slaves were actually MARTHA's!! He got them because women had no rights back in the day, either...they were slaves in much improved circumstances, in essence. I don't think his slaves were particularly well treated, though--he sounds a bit vindictive to me.

Here are some fascinating facts about George and the institution of slavery:

http://www.mountvernon.org/george-washington/slavery/ten-facts-about-washington-slavery/


Despite having been an active slave holder for 56 years, George Washington struggled with the institution of slavery and spoke frequently of his desire to end the practice. At the end of this life Washington made the bold step to free his slaves in his 1799 will - the only slave-holding Founding Father to do so.....


....3. Marrying Martha Washington significantly increased Washington’s number of slaves

After marrying Martha Dandridge Custis in January of 1759, George Washington's slaveholdings increased dramatically. As the widow of a wealthy planter who died without a will in 1757, Martha’s share of the Custis estate brought another eighty-four slaves to Mount Vernon. The stark increase in the enslaved population at Mount Vernon at this time reflected similar trends in the region. When George Washington took control of the Mount Vernon property in 1754, the population of Fairfax County was around 6,500 people, of whom a little more than 1,800 or about 28% were slaves of African origin. The proportion of slaves in the population as a whole rose throughout the century; by the end of the American Revolution, over 40% of the people living in Fairfax County were slaves.

4. Accounts vary regarding Washington’s treatment of the Mount Vernon’s enslaved population

Sources offer differing insight into Washington's behavior as a slave owner. On one end of the spectrum, Richard Parkinson, an Englishman who lived near Mount Vernon, once reported that "it was the sense of all his [Washington's] neighbors that he treated his slaves with more severity than any other man." Conversely, a foreign visitor traveling in America once recorded that George Washington dealt with his slaves "far more humanely than do his fellow citizens of Virginia." What is clear is that Washington frequently utilized harsh punishment against the enslaved population, including whippings and the threat of particularly taxing work assignments. Perhaps most severely, Washington could sell a slave to a buyer in the West Indies, ensuring that the person would never see their family or friends at Mount Vernon again. Washington conducted such sales on several occasions.
....

6. On numerous occasions, slaves ran away from the Washington household in an attempt to gain their freedom.

Mount Vernon’s enslaved community took opportunities, when possible, to physically escape their enslavement. For example, in April of 1781 during the American Revolution, seventeen members of the Mount Vernon enslaved population—fourteen men and three women—fled to the British warship HMS Savage anchored in the Potomac off the shore of the plantation. In other instances, members of the enslaved community who were directly connected to the Washingtons either attempted to or were successful in their escape plans. These individuals included Washington’s personal assistant Christopher Sheels, whose plan to escape with his fiancée was thwarted, the family cook Hercules and Martha Washington’s personal maid Oney Judge, both of whom escaped successfully.

7. Slaves at Mount Vernon also resisted their enslavement through less noticeable means

Running away was a risky venture that often did not succeed. As a result, Mount Vernon’s enslaved population frequently resisted their bondage through a variety of methods while working on the plantation. Individuals utilized less noticeable methods of resistance, including feigning illness, working slowly, producing shoddy work, and misplacing or damaging tools and equipment. More active means of protest included actions such as theft, arson, and sabotage of crops. Theft was a particularly frequently act of visible slave resistance. Over the years slaves at Mount Vernon were accused of stealing a wide variety of objects, including tools, fabrics, yam, raw wool, wine, rum, milk, butter, fruits, meats, corn, and potatoes.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

NOLA activists have dealt with the existence of Jefferson Davis Parkway KamaAina Jun 2015 #1
That needs to become official. Stinky The Clown Jun 2015 #3
It probably has a higher dropout rate KamaAina Jun 2015 #2
I agree with you. Aside from the racist implications, America isn't in the habit of celebrating MADem Jun 2015 #4
Your post made me wonder if there was a statue of William Westmoreland... malthaussen Jun 2015 #10
He's been dead a decade, now. I think the horse has left that barn. MADem Jun 2015 #12
The figure on the left in the Three Soldiers... malthaussen Jun 2015 #18
Considering American slavery edhopper Jun 2015 #5
I was about to suggest that comparison. Lizzie Poppet Jun 2015 #13
Lee didn't turn against the Fatherland. Rommel did in the end. leveymg Jun 2015 #20
Lee turned against the Country he swore an oath to defend edhopper Jun 2015 #21
That is true, as well. leveymg Jun 2015 #23
Should we rename Washington D.C.? former9thward Jun 2015 #6
Or simply continue celebrating slave owners for being slave owners? LanternWaste Jun 2015 #11
And I understand your refusal to be consistent. former9thward Jun 2015 #19
Is Washington only honored for being a slave owner. edhopper Jun 2015 #22
Actually Lee had a marvelous record exboyfil Jun 2015 #30
recognition yes edhopper Jun 2015 #32
Try again. NuclearDem Jun 2015 #24
He didn't try to break away from the country in order to preserve the institution of slavery. MADem Jun 2015 #34
Washington is remembered for much more than owning slaves. And he never fought for the pnwmom Jun 2015 #37
Ask Obama to take down the statue of Jefferson Davis in D.C. former9thward Jun 2015 #41
He's had a few other things to do. But you could ask. n/t pnwmom Jun 2015 #42
He plays a lot of golf. former9thward Jun 2015 #44
Well, that's easy. malthaussen Jun 2015 #7
General Lee actually did some atoning after the war. n/t Orsino Jun 2015 #8
Diff is that this country has a fetish for honoring military Panich52 Jun 2015 #9
Lee dodn't commit genocide.. okasha Jun 2015 #14
It's not like he is responsible for more American deaths edhopper Jun 2015 #16
No, it isn't. okasha Jun 2015 #35
point taken edhopper Jun 2015 #47
Get back to me on Lee okasha Jun 2015 #49
I disagree edhopper Jun 2015 #53
No, ed, I'm not okasha Jun 2015 #55
you want it's symbols edhopper Jun 2015 #56
I never said that, either. okasha Jun 2015 #59
But you said that is the issue edhopper Jun 2015 #60
No, I didn't. okasha Jun 2015 #61
Yeah edhopper Jun 2015 #62
Grant, Sherman and Sheridan committed genocide? leveymg Jun 2015 #25
Perhaps? okasha Jun 2015 #27
When I said perhaps, I meant I wasn't sure about Sheridan. On second look, leveymg Jun 2015 #29
Thank you for clarifying. okasha Jun 2015 #36
Like Native Americans don't count or something?? nt B2G Jun 2015 #38
You don't read past the header, do you? leveymg Jun 2015 #46
It's wrong to use the Nazi comparison in this case. mwooldri Jun 2015 #15
Why worry about a Lee High School when there are TexasProgresive Jun 2015 #17
9 Army posts are named after Confederate Generals GP6971 Jun 2015 #39
Thanks, I knew there were more than my list TexasProgresive Jun 2015 #40
Well, at first glance, because of all the genocide. Iggo Jun 2015 #26
Point of order: More comparable to von Rundstedt High MohRokTah Jun 2015 #28
It isn't. It also is the same as Benedict Arnold Academy. Warren Stupidity Jun 2015 #31
Look at the resurrection of Joe Paterno's NM_Birder Jun 2015 #33
Lee =! Himmler Adrahil Jun 2015 #43
I think you're projecting present-day feelings about states and federal government on winter is coming Jun 2015 #54
Shelby Foote is a Confederate apologist. Adrahil Jun 2015 #64
Calling Foote an apologist is a simplistic overstatement. winter is coming Jun 2015 #65
Here in Germany, my daughters went to a school named after a famous World War II person DFW Jun 2015 #45
Germany had systematic de-Nazification. In America, the South rose again and controls the gov't leveymg Jun 2015 #48
The west did. The east did so in name only DFW Jun 2015 #50
Here's my take on that. leveymg Jun 2015 #52
There's a school named for Robert E. Lee in my city loyalsister Jun 2015 #51
How is "Columbus, Ohio" any different from "Hitler, Poland"? (nt) Nye Bevan Jun 2015 #57
Would you support the bulldozing and destruction of confederate Graves? n/t oneshooter Jun 2015 #58
You read my mind! Duppers Jun 2015 #63
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How is a "Gen Lee Hi...»Reply #34