Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Same old crap starting again... [View all]pnwmom
(110,225 posts)73. Wrong. Lots of moderate Dems and independents won't vote for a socialist. Period.
And there's no reason that a moderate Dem or independent wouldn't believe Sanders and also believe Clinton. I'm not talking about Rethugs, I'm talking about moderates and centrists.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
95 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
There are also a couple of threads I started about Mondale, supposedly the other ""proof"
merrily
Jun 2015
#7
Amazing how 1972 is totally relevant, but 2008 has been completely forgotten and written off.
Warren DeMontague
Jun 2015
#5
When personal wealth is involved, conservatives tend to have memory lapses. nt
raouldukelives
Jun 2015
#20
True. And the simple fact of the matter is, we live in a completely different world now.
Warren DeMontague
Jun 2015
#43
Okay, but like I said. Would you use the elections of '24 and '28 as a lens to analyze the political
Warren DeMontague
Jun 2015
#44
Another example no one seems to like, in '04 we nominated the supposedly "smarter, stronger" choice.
Warren DeMontague
Jun 2015
#74
Bernie calls himself a Democratic Socialist, and that's unfortunate, no matter what most
pnwmom
Jun 2015
#9
Risque lifestyle? That sort of verbiage makes LGBT people wary, just so you know.
Bluenorthwest
Jun 2015
#23
If it's toxic for Clinton as a lie, it would be 10 times as toxic for Sanders, as confirmed truth.
pnwmom
Jun 2015
#63
If hearing the word SOCIALIST will be enough, they won't be voting for the Democrat.
jeff47
Jun 2015
#72
Wrong. Lots of moderate Dems and independents won't vote for a socialist. Period.
pnwmom
Jun 2015
#73
That is what rightwingers have told me for years on the nets, that America is a
randys1
Jun 2015
#76
The ACA greatly helped people over 55. Yes, the premiums can be 3 times as high --
pnwmom
Jun 2015
#83
I don't see how that would be true since subsidies limit the amount to 8% of income. n/g
pnwmom
Jun 2015
#86
Are you talking about a family plan? Because no individual plan has an out of pocket of $12K.
pnwmom
Jun 2015
#92
Exactly right. That's why we won't worry about them. "The people to whom "socialist!!!!" is highly
rhett o rick
Jun 2015
#88
I think that's pretty astute, kind of a sunk cost fallacy for social progress
Fumesucker
Jun 2015
#95
And they won't hear about him because his campaign hasn't got the money to get his message out.
MohRokTah
Jun 2015
#46
