Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 01:18 PM Jun 2015

Read the 7 Most Ridiculous Lines from Justice Antonin Scalia's Obamacare Dissent--Tony-boy haz a MAD [View all]

In a blistering 21-page dissent, Justice Antonin Scalia accused John Roberts of abandoning his judicial independence to defend Obamacare at any and all costs. "Normal rules of interpretation seem always to yield to the overriding principle of the present Court: The Affordable Care Act must be saved," Scalia writes.

Just how absurd is it, in Scalia's mind, that the court upheld the subsidies? Here are his other prime quotes of indignation at the majority's opinion:

* "Words no longer have meaning if an Exchange that is not established by a State is 'established by the State.'"


* "[The decision] rewrites the law to make tax credits available everywhere. We should start calling this law SCOTUScare".

* "The Court holds that when the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act says 'Exchange established by the State' it means 'Exchange established by the State or the Federal Government.' That is of course quite absurd, and the Court's 21 pages of explanation make it no less so."


* "You would think the answer would be obvious—so obvious there would hardly be a need for the Supreme Court to hear a case about it."


* "Impossible possibility, thy name is an opinion on the Affordable Care Act!"

* "Today's interpretation is not merely unnatural; it is unheard of."


* "The cases will publish forever the discouraging truth that the Supreme Court of the United States favors some laws over others, and is prepared to do whatever it takes to uphold and assist its favorites."


http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2015/06/obamacare-king-burwell-scalia-dissent

____________________

What a contemptible excuse of an impartial jurist this gasbag is. If he didn't wield so much power, he'd be laughable in the extreme.


19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nothing makes me happier sharp_stick Jun 2015 #1
Justices almost always say "I respectfully dissent" bluestateguy Jun 2015 #2
Hmmm... onecaliberal Jun 2015 #3
KABOOOM!!!! Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #4
How much Fox news do you think Scalia watches? Johonny Jun 2015 #5
I think he has demonstrated his incompetence to serve as a Justice. MineralMan Jun 2015 #6
I believe his high blood pressure and other obvious health issues Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #7
No spoilers please (snicker) nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #8
You'll enjoy it, nadin, when you finally get to it! Guaranteed laffs! Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #9
Well about to post the one on Housing nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #10
It must be lonely knowing that just about every Constitutional scholar + 6 SCOTUS members disagree yellowcanine Jun 2015 #11
Not good for your dyspepsia and hyper-tension. Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #12
"Today's interpretation is not merely unnatural; it is unheard of." cui bono Jun 2015 #13
More of that selective RW 'logic'... Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #15
Fuck that peice of shit used car salemen! Rex Jun 2015 #14
If he keeps having conniption fits like this, his days may be numbered. Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #16
Sadly, evil lingers a long time. Rex Jun 2015 #17
"...when we win the WH in 2016...", from your keyboard to the Creative Entity's ears. Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #18
Ok, Tony, be consistent... davekriss Jun 2015 #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Read the 7 Most Ridiculou...