Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 5-4 SSM WIN!!!!.SCOTUS--OBERGEFELL---OPINION... [View all]Igel
(37,613 posts)45. It's a form of marriage in some places.
And if marriage evolves and changes--presumably only in one direction--then you may have to wait for civil rights for polygamists for longer than 3 years, but there's no reason to think that there's any real moral principle that currently denies it won't be corrected.
Unless, of course, it's continued to be considered immoral, in which case the universe's moral arc continues to be ours. (That's sort of the problem with saying that our moral evolution is really a great, cosmic change towards ultimate justice. It confuses a small group of primates with some sort of anthropomorphized deistic universe. Not only are we the world, we are the deistic universe, lock, stock and barrel.)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
That says it all. The concept of marriage has evolved over the years.
greatauntoftriplets
Jun 2015
#28
Free Republic has gone insane--they are looking for the plagues to start...nt
msanthrope
Jun 2015
#33
Ah--the Cavers. Those poor, sad bastards who couldn't handle Freeperdom....nt
msanthrope
Jun 2015
#35
I think we see a heightened scrutiny in this decision.....and I think by the invocation of
msanthrope
Jun 2015
#41