Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

linuxman

(2,337 posts)
39. Good! Marriage equality for all, no exceptions!
Fri Jul 3, 2015, 11:47 PM
Jul 2015

I wish them all the best.

Some of those arguing against these folks are using the same exact arguments the right wing has been using against same-sex marriage for years. Very telling.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Montana Trio Applying for Marriage License [View all] TampaAnimusVortex Jul 2015 OP
Good for them. I hope they are successful. nt kelly1mm Jul 2015 #1
No. NuclearDem Jul 2015 #2
Ah, a post that links to a notorious libertarian website. demmiblue Jul 2015 #3
Oh fine... I could care less where the story comes from. TampaAnimusVortex Jul 2015 #13
BTW: did you start this OP because of the recent, and well justified, locks? demmiblue Jul 2015 #4
No. It just popped on my facebook from a friend TampaAnimusVortex Jul 2015 #6
Well, my advice would be to reconsider posting what your 'friends' think. demmiblue Jul 2015 #9
more rw libertarian bullshit equating same-sex marriage with harems geek tragedy Jul 2015 #5
Actually, it looks to me like it's supporting polygamy. TampaAnimusVortex Jul 2015 #8
it trivializes the same-sex marriage decision into a glibertarian one of 'freedommmm!" geek tragedy Jul 2015 #11
I'm not sure how anyone would justify interfering. TampaAnimusVortex Jul 2015 #12
the question is not interference but granting legal rights, benefits, privileges and the imposition geek tragedy Jul 2015 #14
I'm not sure what your talking about. TampaAnimusVortex Jul 2015 #17
our legal system is built around the assumption that a person can geek tragedy Jul 2015 #18
Thank YOU! smirkymonkey Jul 2015 #32
Bingo. cwydro Jul 2015 #10
+1000 smirkymonkey Jul 2015 #31
None of my biz. Puzzledtraveller Jul 2015 #7
have been expecting this! oldandhappy Jul 2015 #15
I'm gonna say onethatcares Jul 2015 #16
No government imposed rules are legitimate now because gay people can get married. prayin4rain Jul 2015 #19
Bad idea davidpdx Jul 2015 #20
Messy yes, but more complex relationships than 2 party partnerships also exist in business HereSince1628 Jul 2015 #21
I disagree davidpdx Jul 2015 #29
This presumption is sort of a wild trump : In the event of no legal written HereSince1628 Jul 2015 #30
How long until two corporations try to marry? Orrex Jul 2015 #22
Mitt and Bain: Our story nt geek tragedy Jul 2015 #24
OK But only one Social Security check and one food stamp card. nt kelliekat44 Jul 2015 #23
Sick tricks from passive-agressive bullies. They should be ashamed of themselves. n/t Betty Karlson Jul 2015 #25
I think it is great. Finally happiness for everyone. yeoman6987 Jul 2015 #28
Because this is making a mockery of same sex marriage. smirkymonkey Jul 2015 #33
That is 100 percent your opinion. yeoman6987 Jul 2015 #34
Mine, and anyone who is not against the decision. smirkymonkey Jul 2015 #37
The decision is 100 percent supported here yeoman6987 Jul 2015 #38
I'm not. I just think this argument makes a mockery of marraige equality. smirkymonkey Jul 2015 #48
Same feeling here. n/t Betty Karlson Jul 2015 #49
Don't some religious folks already do this? It just wasn't recognized by the state before ileus Jul 2015 #26
Obviously marriage equalization does not promote polygamy rock Jul 2015 #27
I'm looking forward to the courts smacking this down. nt Ilsa Jul 2015 #35
Well that is biblical Marriage at its finest! n/t n2doc Jul 2015 #36
Good! Marriage equality for all, no exceptions! linuxman Jul 2015 #39
As opposed to the people playing the "if there's SSM, then why not polygamy?" card. NuclearDem Jul 2015 #40
. linuxman Jul 2015 #41
Yes, there is precedent for polygamy being a terrible institution. NuclearDem Jul 2015 #42
What's the current divorce rate for 1:1 couples? linuxman Jul 2015 #43
Oh, so please spare me the "you're the REAL bigot here" bullshit NuclearDem Jul 2015 #44
Spare me your BS. linuxman Jul 2015 #45
Aww, so transparent, it's adorable! NuclearDem Jul 2015 #46
linuxman is right you know your just using the same arguments that were used against gay marriage, Katashi_itto Jul 2015 #47
You're right! NuclearDem Jul 2015 #53
Lol! So predictable. Your arguments are the same again. Katashi_itto Jul 2015 #54
Polygamy has been studied extensively where it's been and currently is practiced. NuclearDem Jul 2015 #55
Forget it. romanic Jul 2015 #50
I'd bet fundies are behind this. xfundy Jul 2015 #51
This has already been beaten nigh to death here... DeadLetterOffice Jul 2015 #52
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Montana Trio Applying for...»Reply #39