General Discussion

NightWatcher

(39,377 posts)

23. No incest. I knew I'd forget something

Reply to philosslayer (Reply #21)

Sun Jul 5, 2015, 06:02 PM

Jul 2015

Thanks for the reminder.

Barring any more edits I think I'm good.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

65 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I don't care who the hell gets married [View all] NightWatcher Jul 2015 OP

I dare you to say that to a certain redhead I know. hobbit709 Jul 2015 #1

+1 DashOneBravo Jul 2015 #4

I don't care who gets married Warpy Jul 2015 #2

I have a 5'11'' red head daughter, wendylaroux Jul 2015 #3

Same here. Cracklin Charlie Jul 2015 #29

i also wendylaroux Jul 2015 #39

Congratulations! Cracklin Charlie Jul 2015 #63

What's with the conserva-Dem anti-polygamy freak out? DirkGently Jul 2015 #5

You see that too? PowerToThePeople Jul 2015 #6

I don't get it, but I sense bullshit afoot. DirkGently Jul 2015 #9

I agree PowerToThePeople Jul 2015 #10

people objecting to the rightwing equating gays marrying to polygamy are "rabid badgers". KittyWampus Jul 2015 #11

Some one PMed me awoke_in_2003 Jul 2015 #61

so you side with the people using polygamy as a way to attack GLBT. Good to know. KittyWampus Jul 2015 #7

That premise is ridiculous on its face. DirkGently Jul 2015 #12

I've seen most DU'ers pointing out the many reasons polygamy is a bad idea AND KittyWampus Jul 2015 #13

It's not "bigotry," is the point. DirkGently Jul 2015 #15

So in your mind allowing gays and lesbians to participate in state-sanctioned geek tragedy Jul 2015 #19

We have established religious tradition has no role DirkGently Jul 2015 #22

You are still laboring under the delusion that institutionalized monogamous marriage geek tragedy Jul 2015 #28

No, the point is polygamy isn't homophobic "bigotry." DirkGently Jul 2015 #32

If you see getting rid of the current legal paradigm of monogamous marriage geek tragedy Jul 2015 #34

No, discussing polygamy is not "bigotry." It just isn't. DirkGently Jul 2015 #37

There is no polygamy movement. geek tragedy Jul 2015 #40

You don't get to decide which opinions are legitimate. DirkGently Jul 2015 #44

What's with all the libertarians? gollygee Jul 2015 #8

It's conserva-Dems flipping out, though. DirkGently Jul 2015 #14

There are no Conservadems here. So, you're already starting your rant off geek tragedy Jul 2015 #17

Arguing marriage is "an institution" is conservative. DirkGently Jul 2015 #20

WTF? Not only are you insulting. You are not well informed. As a cultural anthropologist KittyWampus Jul 2015 #27

Community standards evolve outside of religious prejudice. DirkGently Jul 2015 #33

YOUR words- marriage is not an Institution. My recitation of FACT- marriage is an institution. KittyWampus Jul 2015 #55

Well, it's a set of legal rights. Maybe in religion it's an "institution?" DirkGently Jul 2015 #58

Ugh. No, you just have no idea what you are talking about. geek tragedy Jul 2015 #31

Marriage as "an institution" is a rightwing point of view. DirkGently Jul 2015 #35

Ugh. You are projectile vomiting rightwing talking points geek tragedy Jul 2015 #47

You're causing the sensible woodchucks to race to their panic rooms LittleBlue Jul 2015 #50

someone who doesn't acknowledge a BASIC fact that marriage is a cultural institution KittyWampus Jul 2015 #54

No, those who share the progressive left's views on gender and sexuality have been geek tragedy Jul 2015 #16

There are more forms of polyamorous marriage than the Warren Jeffs model. hobbit709 Jul 2015 #18

You think all governmental recognition of marriage relationships geek tragedy Jul 2015 #24

They're comparing the polyamorous to animals, basically. DirkGently Jul 2015 #25

No matter what form, modern society rightly evolved away from them. KittyWampus Jul 2015 #30

Must be nice to have that level of moral certitude. hobbit709 Jul 2015 #64

It's a well orchestrated Republican rat fuck against both LGBT and polyamorous people... hunter Jul 2015 #36

It certainly features the traditional pot-stirrers. DirkGently Jul 2015 #38

Well said! nt Mojorabbit Jul 2015 #51

"Sensible Woodchucks" Le Taz Hot Jul 2015 #43

Seriously. How do those pieces fit together? DirkGently Jul 2015 #45

you are laughing at someone who doesn't think marriage is a cultural institution. KittyWampus Jul 2015 #56

+100000 LittleBlue Jul 2015 #46

Pulling the ladder up after they climb it Fumesucker Jul 2015 #49

That would be a straw man argument. But your apparent sense of superiority as exhibited KittyWampus Jul 2015 #57

I'm sharing my opinion on a discussion board like all the other posters on DU Fumesucker Jul 2015 #59

Siblings? Father and Daughter? Mother and Son? philosslayer Jul 2015 #21

No incest. I knew I'd forget something NightWatcher Jul 2015 #23

You should put a sarcasm emoticon on your note: Cleita Jul 2015 #26

Damn the torpedoes (and sarcasm emoticons) Full speed ahead NightWatcher Jul 2015 #41

You get an "Amen" from me. Le Taz Hot Jul 2015 #42

Ordering up an asskicking for NightWatcher from Skittles. Yes Indeed!! madinmaryland Jul 2015 #48

I personally think marriage TNNurse Jul 2015 #52

K&R! Omaha Steve Jul 2015 #53

It IS really interesting to see the usual suspects being so riled up about this Hydra Jul 2015 #60

An impulse to preserve the religious model, maybe? DirkGently Jul 2015 #65

I only care if I have to buy them a gift Skittles Jul 2015 #62