Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(30,884 posts)

17. And my point is that we can table the decision on where to end, and just start with Confederate

Sat Jul 11, 2015, 03:44 PM

Jul 2015

generals and leaders of the Confederacy because they were intent on dissolving the country.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"Politician Asks Fort Bragg to Change Its Name, Town Scoffs" [View all] Comrade Grumpy Jul 2015 OP

What about these U.S. Army posts? TexasProgresive Jul 2015 #1

Fort Lauderdale, Fort Myers, and Fort Pierce in Florida 1939 Jul 2015 #2

Los Angeles is a particularly nasty problem. Igel Jul 2015 #10

Los Angeles isn't named after anyone. Spider Jerusalem Jul 2015 #12

Timeline doesn't make sense. bluedigger Jul 2015 #3

I think the newspaper article has its history confused. Comrade Grumpy Jul 2015 #4

In my personal experience, that is always a safe assumption. bluedigger Jul 2015 #5

There are so many places all over this country (and world) cwydro Jul 2015 #6

Starting down that path leads to wholesale place name changes. MineralMan Jul 2015 #8

There have been wholesale name changes already. Lots of Gormy Cuss Jul 2015 #13

Not as many as you might think, really. MineralMan Jul 2015 #14

I think you'd be surprised. But it's not just MineralMan Jul 2015 #16

I can accept that easily Glassunion Jul 2015 #11