Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Is this the begining [View all]
 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
7. Wrong answer, it is baked into the Constitution with the winner take all
Tue Jul 14, 2015, 01:34 PM
Jul 2015

if that is somehow changed to allow for proportional representation, for example, both major parties will break up into a few smaller parties. And smaller parties will have a better chance to get representatives. It actually would be good for the country at this point, imho, but that ain't gonna happen with the two major parties benefiting from this.

As long as the winner take all system is in place...

Experts in things like partisanship have suggested that we need to do that anyhow, because hyper partisanship has developed into a quasi parliamentary system which is not compatible with the American system and the source of a lot of our disfunction in DC now spreading to state houses.

Oh and this starts in the 1970s, not the 90s as I used to believe.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is this the begining»Reply #7