Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Civil War Really Was About Slavery. Really. It Was. [View all]Just as I asked and thought. The majority if not all of the soldiers of the confederacy were not the slave owners, but fighting for their leaders who basically pushed them into this conflict. How many southern soldiers came home after this war with a cheery outlook on life...hmmm not too many, knowing their homes, farms, livestock all destroyed, wives and children possibly killed or worse. Ask a vet of today and many will say they fought over in Iraq to help free the people, etc. What did the confederate soldier say? we helped the rich fuckers keep their slaves? I think they may have said "What the fuck was this war about?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
75 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
And the north promoted segregation, kept blacks from voting for nearly a century...
951-Riverside
Jul 2015
#1
in "gone with the wind", rhett butler points out, before the war is declared, that all
niyad
Jul 2015
#23
I've never talked to anyone or read about this, but I was annoyed at Shelby Foote's attitude in
C Moon
Jul 2015
#8
They want to claim the Confederacy was about "Southern hospitality" too....
Spitfire of ATJ
Jul 2015
#10
Here in Nashville, I was taught it was fought over slavery as that was the hottest
Uncle Joe
Jul 2015
#68
That makes it sound like the Southern and border states were arguing against state power
Uncle Joe
Jul 2015
#73
Secession was definitely about slavery. The war that followed had more complex reasons behind it
onenote
Jul 2015
#20
The war was started because the North would not cooperate with the South regarding slavery
whereisjustice
Jul 2015
#24
Of course it was. The only thing they say today is it was economic - of course - they were
jwirr
Jul 2015
#22
Lincoln's call for militia troops, after the attack on Fort Sumner, was based on the Militia Act
struggle4progress
Jul 2015
#64
The secession of NC is noteworthy because a referendum had already decided decisively against it,
struggle4progress
Jul 2015
#65
They also fought for the right to be slave holders themselves, one day. From a 50,000 ft view
whereisjustice
Jul 2015
#36
Yes, and you can hear the echoes of that arg in the "freedom of religion" debate in which
whereisjustice
Jul 2015
#42
ANY time that "states' rights" thing comes up - it's all about sanitizing racism. lee atwater
calimary
Jul 2015
#45
great point and most recently, the racism behind the campaign "protecting against voter fraud".
whereisjustice
Jul 2015
#50