Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
2. Oh, and a second point...
Tue Jul 14, 2015, 04:13 PM
Jul 2015
Large-scale organic farming operations, based on a review of almost a decade of data from 49 states, are not reducing greenhouse gas emissions, says a University of Oregon researcher.


Doesn't that seem to suggest that the purpose of organic farming was 'reducing greenhouse gas emissions'? That somehow organic farming has 'failed' because it doesn't do so?

Of course, this is the first time I've even heard it suggested that the point of organic farming was to 'reduce greenhouse gas emissions'. It may well have been suggested over time, I guess, but it's not why anyone I know who eats or grows organic does so.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Large-scale organic farmi...»Reply #2