Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Start a movement madokie Jul 2015 #1
What is the purpose of taxes? 1939 Jul 2015 #2
We should tax and tax and tax them until they're only fabulously wealthy. Scuba Jul 2015 #3
In other words, to punish 1939 Jul 2015 #4
How are they punished if they remain fabulously wealthy? Do they have some inalienable ... Scuba Jul 2015 #10
Not inalienable.... daleanime Jul 2015 #52
That's garbage. PETRUS Jul 2015 #11
We do not punish the rich. They are rich and the law is for the commoners. hifiguy Jul 2015 #45
Oh, my, your stunning insight has forced me to change my mind.... daleanime Jul 2015 #51
Certainly, a progressive tax scheme would raise the percentage closeupready Jul 2015 #5
The purpose of taxes. PETRUS Jul 2015 #6
Was thinking of posting, but you beat me to it. Xyzse Jul 2015 #8
... PETRUS Jul 2015 #9
Then make the argument 1939 Jul 2015 #13
Here's a paper: PETRUS Jul 2015 #14
Not an expert on this subject at all but I do know that when Eisenhower had 91% taxation for the jwirr Jul 2015 #16
+1 daleanime Jul 2015 #53
+2 Enthusiast Jul 2015 #58
Please make your argument too. Gormy Cuss Jul 2015 #73
I don't have a paper, but here goes 1939 Jul 2015 #105
That is not an accurate characterization of the paper. PETRUS Jul 2015 #108
Unfortunately, there are no safeguards that limit the power Zorra Jul 2015 #15
I like this solution also. jwirr Jul 2015 #19
Nicely done. Thank you. Scuba Jul 2015 #63
Whereever that sweet spot is, we can tax quite a bit and not get near it. el_bryanto Jul 2015 #17
"punish people for being winners" lumberjack_jeff Jul 2015 #54
What A Load Of Rubbish ProfessorGAC Jul 2015 #65
Defending the rich on DU????? Hotler Jul 2015 #68
wrong TheFarseer Jul 2015 #91
Ah yes, the appropriately named Laffer curve Major Nikon Jul 2015 #93
Yeah the rich should be punished for their greed treestar Jul 2015 #97
No one knows where the 'sweet spot' is and there really isn't a good way to find out. PoliticAverse Jul 2015 #103
You had better hope they stay very wealthy hack89 Jul 2015 #7
The definition of rich is relative. And they have already stopped paying thier fair share of taxes. jwirr Jul 2015 #20
You miss my point hack89 Jul 2015 #22
Sorry. Yet we have to do something about the wealth inequality and the large corporations and jwirr Jul 2015 #23
You don't really have a point. PETRUS Jul 2015 #24
Making rich people indispensable is fine with me hack89 Jul 2015 #26
Higher marginal tax rates don't make rich people indispensable. PETRUS Jul 2015 #28
+1 a huge bunch! Very well said. Enthusiast Jul 2015 #59
Just an aside, other cities have their own income tax TacoD Jul 2015 #27
Even small communities can have a income tax. They add their percentage to the state tax and jwirr Jul 2015 #80
Quantify "fair share" NT 1939 Jul 2015 #79
Well you are correct about that. I guess that is why we have brakets. Given the profits the rich jwirr Jul 2015 #81
They didn't rebel, they just adjusted their investments 1939 Jul 2015 #83
So in a sense the Rs are right - they are the job creators. Only now they are creating those jobs jwirr Jul 2015 #85
In the hypothetical world that results from overtaxing the rich... *sniff*... lumberjack_jeff Jul 2015 #55
+1! Well said! Enthusiast Jul 2015 #60
The rich need to pay more hack89 Jul 2015 #61
"Gimme some money" nt clarice Jul 2015 #12
My usual arguement with a "Trickle Down Proponent" - paraphrased Xolodno Jul 2015 #18
There should be a cap on income fadedrose Jul 2015 #21
"There should be a cap on income". That's insane. nt clarice Jul 2015 #25
Says you. PETRUS Jul 2015 #29
So, by what moral mandate do you consider yourself entitled to someone else's money? nt clarice Jul 2015 #31
You should ask the corporations and oligarchs PowerToThePeople Jul 2015 #40
No, I am asking a direct question...by what moral mandate.....nt clarice Jul 2015 #42
That is a silly and shallow question. PETRUS Jul 2015 #49
as soon as you put it that way treestar Jul 2015 #99
waiting. nt clarice Jul 2015 #38
You seemed so eager to have this conversation. PETRUS Jul 2015 #86
They pay people, even kids, 20 cents an hour fadedrose Jul 2015 #48
Is that the extent of your argument? Or is there a "Because...." lumberjack_jeff Jul 2015 #56
Tax all wealth over 5 million @ 100%. PowerToThePeople Jul 2015 #30
lol.nt clarice Jul 2015 #32
Ok, sorry. Tax all wealth over 1 million @ 100%. PowerToThePeople Jul 2015 #33
That would CERTAINLY make YOUR life easier. If you have .... clarice Jul 2015 #34
It is only their money PowerToThePeople Jul 2015 #36
You know..... clarice Jul 2015 #37
And what do you call hiding behind a corporate entity that does the upward redistribution? PowerToThePeople Jul 2015 #39
I would look at the number of people that they employ..... clarice Jul 2015 #41
So corporations allow us to live now? PowerToThePeople Jul 2015 #43
My goodness, I don't know where to start with you.....I will try to help you tomorrow.nt clarice Jul 2015 #46
No thanks, I do not need any help PowerToThePeople Jul 2015 #47
You have it backwards. lumberjack_jeff Jul 2015 #57
The "equal income crowd"??? HughBeaumont Jul 2015 #62
Anyone over $1milion? Elmergantry Jul 2015 #98
Not all earning is criminal treestar Jul 2015 #101
Many of the people drawing that level of income have no moral qualms about Gormy Cuss Jul 2015 #76
True, Elmergantry Jul 2015 #110
There's a wide gap between effective tax rates for them now and taxing 'the snot out of them.' Gormy Cuss Jul 2015 #111
Well there are post here Elmergantry Jul 2015 #112
Those are marginal tax rates, not effective tax rates Gormy Cuss Jul 2015 #113
Yes I know your position, and I not referring to moderate tax increases. Elmergantry Jul 2015 #116
See the thing is PowerToThePeople Jul 2015 #115
Dont think it would be constitutional Elmergantry Jul 2015 #117
It certainly could be written into the tax code. PowerToThePeople Jul 2015 #119
Sure it could... Elmergantry Jul 2015 #120
If it is the tax law (not that it is likely to pass soon) treestar Jul 2015 #100
Guess we've got some Milton Friedman Democrats around. Starry Messenger Jul 2015 #35
Some aromas are unmistakable. nt PETRUS Jul 2015 #50
Thanks for all the work up there. :) Starry Messenger Jul 2015 #75
Thanks. PETRUS Jul 2015 #77
Way overdue. HughBeaumont Jul 2015 #90
Eat the rich! hifiguy Jul 2015 #44
I propose a flat tax Orrex Jul 2015 #64
gibberish Lurker Deluxe Jul 2015 #66
Even Hollande in France stopped at 75% over €1 million DFW Jul 2015 #67
Not familiar with hyperbole, I take it? Orrex Jul 2015 #69
OK Lurker Deluxe Jul 2015 #70
Reply where you wish; I can't speak for that other poster. Orrex Jul 2015 #71
I think they should pay higher taxes, but the percentages tossed around here are mind-boggling. Calista241 Jul 2015 #72
Taxing the wealthy is not "punishing the wealthy" Orrex Jul 2015 #74
+1 Scuba Jul 2015 #78
A flat 15% or 20% tax on revenue is way way way too high taught_me_patience Jul 2015 #82
Sounds reasonable. Calista241 Jul 2015 #84
Why have a Federal income tax at all? Elmergantry Jul 2015 #87
See post #6 PETRUS Jul 2015 #88
Disagree with #6 Elmergantry Jul 2015 #95
That's odd. PETRUS Jul 2015 #106
Well yes, I think there is a better way to fund govt. Elmergantry Jul 2015 #109
government shouldn't "pick winners or losers" PETRUS Jul 2015 #114
"Abraham Lincoln did it" NYC Liberal Jul 2015 #94
Yes he did, but that doesnt change the fact Elmergantry Jul 2015 #96
Because inflation is a tax on everyone and distorts economic activity and decisions. PoliticAverse Jul 2015 #104
The rich should pay the vast majority of taxes. Jetboy Jul 2015 #89
+ Eighty Gazillion Scuba Jul 2015 #92
They do. Meanwhile, European countries fund their social spending with a much more regressive VAT Recursion Jul 2015 #107
Our tax rates are much more progressive as they stand compared to Europe Elmergantry Jul 2015 #118
Hardly a revolution PATRICK Jul 2015 #102
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The case for higher taxes...»Reply #44