Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

reorg

(3,317 posts)
55. I'm sure you know better
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 12:39 PM
Jul 2015

than to trust a word this poster says.

Took me three minutes to find (actually, it was the second link I clicked after searching for 'Laura Poitras rooftop'):

In 2006, federal agents began stopping Poitras at airports as she was leaving or entering the U.S., asking questions about her travels and her work; on one occasion, they confiscated her electronic equipment. She began taking notes during the interrogations, and argued when she was told to stop. Altogether, she says, she was detained at least forty times between 2006 and 2012, without ever being told why. It might have had to do with a 2004 incident in Baghdad: American soldiers saw her filming from Dr. Riyadh’s roof during a firefight in the neighborhood, and, according to an article by Peter Maass in the Times Magazine, an officer wrote a report suggesting that she might have had foreknowledge of the attack. (She denied having any, and no evidence suggests otherwise.) A journalist named John Bruning eventually published a book about the soldiers’ battalion, “The Devil’s Sandbox,” in which he repeated the same charge against Poitras. Then again, she told me, the trigger may have been a wire transfer that she sent in 2006 to Dr. Riyadh when his family fled Iraq’s civil war. Bruning’s book claims that the battalion suspected the doctor of being an insurgent. (There is no evidence for this, either.)

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/10/20/holder-secrets




Laura Poitras on the roof of Archimedes Exhibitions in Berlin. Poitras moved to Berlin to escape the attentions of the US security services. Photograph: Malte Jaeger for the Observer

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This is why the right-wing freaked out over Obama getting elected.... Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2015 #1
Her problems were "between 2006 and 2012." Obama continued the Bush policy. JDPriestly Jul 2015 #2
I'm not alone in my disapointment in Obama not taking the problems head on.... Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2015 #3
You're not alone. Enthusiast Jul 2015 #4
I blame a LOT of that - along BlueMTexpat Jul 2015 #8
To be fair, Prez O probably didn't even know BlueMTexpat Jul 2015 #7
her problems dated from 2004 when she was complicit in an attack on American troops...... msanthrope Jul 2015 #15
You're using the Weekly Standard to make your point? Le Taz Hot Jul 2015 #19
no the Devils sandbox one of the best books ever written about Iraq which I'm sure you've read. msanthrope Jul 2015 #21
I'd like to hear her side of the story. JDPriestly Jul 2015 #20
what's interesting is that she's never responded to the allegations in the book including msanthrope Jul 2015 #24
Hmmm. JDPriestly Jul 2015 #35
I'm sure you know better reorg Jul 2015 #55
A good journalist who is not embedded with one of the fighting armies is bound to JDPriestly Jul 2015 #58
this, and reorg Jul 2015 #60
You're citing the Weekly Standard and claiming she was complicit in an attack on US troops. Comrade Grumpy Jul 2015 #22
I'm citing the Devils sandbox 1 of the greatest books ever written about the Iraq war. msanthrope Jul 2015 #23
You're citing an unsupported claim in an attempt to do a hit on Poitras. It's ugly. Comrade Grumpy Jul 2015 #26
Poitras apparently admitted to being on the rooftop. I'd like to hear her address that but she's msanthrope Jul 2015 #27
You apparently have little understanding of libel laws davekriss Jul 2015 #34
Not just that, but how is that apparent she was helping the enemy? Rex Jul 2015 #37
If she did have pre-knowledge and did nothing, she was helping the enemy. randome Jul 2015 #53
Well, she sure didn't help the Bush regime reorg Jul 2015 #59
The fuckwagon you've hitched your star to is busy today. DisgustipatedinCA Jul 2015 #31
all the more puzzling why Poitras has never sued for libel. msanthrope Jul 2015 #32
It doesn't say she was complicit in an attack, you should go read your own link. Rex Jul 2015 #36
When government is given too much power... Emelina Jul 2015 #5
+1, n/t RKP5637 Jul 2015 #6
I don't think her case will lend itself to obscurity. nt Babel_17 Jul 2015 #9
Kafka and Orwell meet J Edgar Hoover with supercomputers. Octafish Jul 2015 #10
Just frightening stuff marym625 Jul 2015 #41
Me, too, marym625... Octafish Jul 2015 #44
I will never understand it marym625 Jul 2015 #45
Prague's Kafka International Named Most Alienating Airport Ichingcarpenter Jul 2015 #49
She made the documentary on Snowden Kablooie Jul 2015 #11
. Guy Whitey Corngood Jul 2015 #12
Wait - are you saying that goverment harassment of journalists and filmmakers Maedhros Jul 2015 #28
For some reason I thought the part about suing was in the headline. Which is Guy Whitey Corngood Jul 2015 #29
Whew! I didn't think that's what you intended. Maedhros Jul 2015 #30
Well economic collapse is not a threat, at least not to the DHS. You would think a handful of people Rex Jul 2015 #13
she was complicit in an attack on American troops..... msanthrope Jul 2015 #17
That is not what your link says, you are using innuendo as facts and that is sad. Rex Jul 2015 #38
Poitras apparently had foreknowledge of an attack on American troops....that's msanthrope Jul 2015 #14
Weekly Standard..... LOL... oh my god Ichingcarpenter Jul 2015 #16
reporting on information from the Devils sandbox one of the very best books ever written about Iraq msanthrope Jul 2015 #18
Don't think you really understand what libel is. progressoid Jul 2015 #48
Ahem.... as an attorney I do. nt msanthrope Jul 2015 #50
So after reading the book, progressoid Jul 2015 #52
as long as it wasn't true yes. msanthrope Jul 2015 #54
As long as what wasn't true? progressoid Jul 2015 #56
Innuendo is now fact when it is needed, my my...even that link does not say she was complicit. Rex Jul 2015 #39
and yet marym625 Jul 2015 #42
Actually it WAS posted on freerepublic. progressoid Jul 2015 #47
Figures marym625 Jul 2015 #57
I feel so much safer when our heroic defenders protect us from...movies. Tierra_y_Libertad Jul 2015 #25
HUGE K & R !!! - THANK YOU !!! WillyT Jul 2015 #33
K&R! marym625 Jul 2015 #40
A journalist disclosing facts is the most threatening thing of all. pa28 Jul 2015 #43
They really fear the truth tellers. JEB Jul 2015 #46
Authoritarians and spooks really fear the film makers more than the bomb makers. leveymg Jul 2015 #51
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Homeland Security assigne...»Reply #55