Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
4. the only 'enemy' Netanyahu is willing to declare war on is Obama.
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 09:37 AM
Jul 2015

The Europeans have had enough of the Israeli shrillitude, even if the US is willing to tolerate such childish behavior by the ingrates.

Frank-Walter Steinmeier, Germany’s foreign minister, slammed Netanyahu’s recalcitrance and defended the deal as “responsible.” He said, “Israel should also take a closer look at it and not criticize the agreement in a very coarse way.”

Worse, British Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond, who will be in Jerusalem on Thursday, betrayed his lack of sympathy for Netanyahu’s hard line: “The question you have to ask yourself is what kind of a deal would have been welcomed in Tel Aviv. The answer, of course, is that Israel doesn’t want any deal with Iran. Israel wants a permanent state of stand-off, and I don’t believe that’s in the interests of the region.”

The significance of the statement is not principally in its uncommon public expression of exasperation but in the seemingly offhand reference to Israel’s commercial capital. It is almost unheard of for a representative of an Israeli ally to use Tel Aviv as shorthand for the state, which claims Jerusalem as its “eternal, unified capital.”

The offense to Israeli sensibilities on the eve of a state visit is huge.


Now that they've (maybe) begun to turn the corner on Ukraine, Iran, and Greece, the EU will turn to Israel/Palestine, and the Israelis have pretty much burned all their bridges.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Of course they won't gratuitous Jul 2015 #1
An interesting viewpoint that is not held up by the facts. Israel has struck outside I/P several stevenleser Jul 2015 #2
Did you not read the article? oberliner Jul 2015 #3
Of course, but your entire second paragraph doesnt fit the facts in general. stevenleser Jul 2015 #7
That's not my paragraph oberliner Jul 2015 #8
Fair enough. That other posters second paragraph does not fit the facts in general. nt stevenleser Jul 2015 #9
the only 'enemy' Netanyahu is willing to declare war on is Obama. geek tragedy Jul 2015 #4
I suspect that once the Iranian deal is through all the approvals in the UN and US, the EU will turn karynnj Jul 2015 #17
For the next 16 months, Israel is pretty much all alone except for its geek tragedy Jul 2015 #18
- and the Republicans in Congress karynnj Jul 2015 #20
Logistically without the US madville Jul 2015 #5
Not to mention they'd have to go through some combination of Syria, Iraq, geek tragedy Jul 2015 #6
Not true oberliner Jul 2015 #10
They can't carry the 15 ton bunker buster geek tragedy Jul 2015 #11
They wouldn't need to oberliner Jul 2015 #12
So, they'd nuke Iran to launch a war of aggression? geek tragedy Jul 2015 #13
You don’t need a nuclear weapon to set off an EMP oberliner Jul 2015 #14
your imagination is getting ahead of your science. geek tragedy Jul 2015 #15
Would you support Israel initiating an attack on Iran? karynnj Jul 2015 #19
Absolutely not oberliner Jul 2015 #21
Thanks - the flow of the conversation did not either suggest that or reject it karynnj Jul 2015 #22
Note the wording of the military analyst -- and this deal is incredibly significant karynnj Jul 2015 #16
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Israel won’t strike Iran ...»Reply #4