Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BeyondGeography

(41,101 posts)
4. They're not going after all candidates equally
Sun Jul 19, 2015, 08:10 AM
Jul 2015

They're only going after Democrats.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It was about the fact that white supremecy in the US sucks AngryAmish Jul 2015 #1
Any plans by them to confront actual white supremacists? Scootaloo Jul 2015 #3
They're not confronting people for the sake of confronting people. They want CHANGE. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jul 2015 #7
This. After sitting on this for the evening, this is where I came down. At first Ed Suspicious Jul 2015 #26
So, confronting white supremacism by refusing to confront white supremacists Scootaloo Jul 2015 #30
White supremacy is not about individual people gollygee Jul 2015 #20
If someone disagrees with you? kentuck Jul 2015 #31
again, white supremacy is not about individual people. gollygee Jul 2015 #32
How many of those "white supremacists" voted for Barack Obama? kentuck Jul 2015 #33
Is English your first language? gollygee Jul 2015 #34
Would that be the majority or minority of our "society". kentuck Jul 2015 #35
it is not about individual people gollygee Jul 2015 #36
I may be wrong... kentuck Jul 2015 #37
BLM protestors felt they could leverage their protest better by using a venue in which multiple Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jul 2015 #2
They're not going after all candidates equally BeyondGeography Jul 2015 #4
Because they KNOW Republicans will never do squat for them. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jul 2015 #5
Because Democratics make sense JustAnotherGen Jul 2015 #6
Disrupting is not asking for votes BeyondGeography Jul 2015 #8
Yep - sure did JustAnotherGen Jul 2015 #9
O'Malley was embarrassed BeyondGeography Jul 2015 #10
Ask NRN JustAnotherGen Jul 2015 #22
I have to say it's stumped me that no one "gets" that yet daredtowork Jul 2015 #24
If they prevent Dems from getting their message out newfie11 Jul 2015 #11
They came to a party that speaks of championing people and making political revolution. HereSince1628 Jul 2015 #14
It doesn't matter because they know they already have our vote davidn3600 Jul 2015 #16
If you plan on giving away your vote no matter what, then sure, they've already got your vote. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jul 2015 #18
OK.... so BLM is demanding something...but what? davidn3600 Jul 2015 #19
Check out the diary in the link I'm providing in this comment for your answer. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jul 2015 #21
Nice he brought up Sandra Bland and the Voting Rights Act right off the bat daredtowork Jul 2015 #27
For one, they'd like a President who takes the issues they face seriously. raouldukelives Jul 2015 #12
You can't support the for profit prison industry, War on Drugs, then say "Black Lives Matter"... Romulox Jul 2015 #13
A message was sent. greytdemocrat Jul 2015 #15
Let's see them disrupt a Republican event... tenderfoot Jul 2015 #17
Sanders and O'Malley both screwed up. And Hillary has as well. PeaceNikki Jul 2015 #23
Thanks for posting that! daredtowork Jul 2015 #25
Paying attention to #blacklivesmatter for one week will tell you who all of the leaders are. MohRokTah Jul 2015 #28
For once we agree on something daredtowork Jul 2015 #29
Locking - Democratic Primary Thread should be posted in GD-P MineralMan Jul 2015 #38
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»'Black Lives Matter' Acti...»Reply #4