Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)On the evolution of language and the "W" word [View all]
Here

Faux "news" and "Judge" Jeanine Pirro are still flogging the fake Benghazi "scandal" for every drop they can get out of it. This Saturday, Pirro attacked former CIA director Michael Morell as a "political whore" and accused him of lying to Congress to protect Hillary Clinton.
http://crooksandliars.com/2014/04/foxs-pirro-calls-former-cia-director
http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--PZrtoTUa--/c_fit,fl_progressive,q_80,w_636/ll1bn7yqsf8zqeqwozk5.jpg
Political Whores Form Brothel
The executive director of the Republican Governor's Association and the executive director of the Democratic Governor's Association announced today that they are getting together to sell their mutual political connections to the highest bidder.
THE POLITICO reports that RGA head Phil Cox and DGA head Colm O'Comartun are now ready to completely abandon any pretense of ideals or, indeed, care for any cause greater than their own bank accounts. They are forming "a bipartisan consulting firm that will help corporate clients navigate state governments," which is the very highest calling of those who have entered the noble field of politics. Their new brothel, 50 States LLC, will be a one-stop shop where corporate interests can get all of their strategic consulting needs met by seasoned political operatives unburdened by any form of mortal soul. No longer will you, the corporate client, need to hire a Democratic firm to pursue your interests with Democrats, and a Republican firm to pursue your interests with Republicans; now, you can hire one firm that believes in absolutely nothing except the almighty dollar, saving you a great deal of hassle.
THE POLITICO reports that RGA head Phil Cox and DGA head Colm O'Comartun are now ready to completely abandon any pretense of ideals or, indeed, care for any cause greater than their own bank accounts. They are forming "a bipartisan consulting firm that will help corporate clients navigate state governments," which is the very highest calling of those who have entered the noble field of politics. Their new brothel, 50 States LLC, will be a one-stop shop where corporate interests can get all of their strategic consulting needs met by seasoned political operatives unburdened by any form of mortal soul. No longer will you, the corporate client, need to hire a Democratic firm to pursue your interests with Democrats, and a Republican firm to pursue your interests with Republicans; now, you can hire one firm that believes in absolutely nothing except the almighty dollar, saving you a great deal of hassle.
http://gawker.com/political-whores-form-brothel-1671380006
For the record, this piece has in it the definition of the term, in better language than Urban Dictionary.
http://a4.img.talkingpointsmemo.com/image/upload/c_fill,fl_keep_iptc,g_faces,h_365,w_652/msuwctueeuw6cni0anrs.jpg
California NOW President: 'Meg Whitman Could Be Described As A Political Whore'
Last week, the National Organization for Women and the PAC of the California NOW chapter took heat for their endorsement of state Attorney General Jerry Brown (D) over Meg Whitman (R) in the gubernatorial race in the wake of comments by a Brown aide that Whitman was a "whore." At the time, national NOW President Terry O'Neill said that anyone who "from here on" calls a woman a "whore" should be fired.
She might want to have a talk with California NOW President Parry Bellasalma, who today told TPM in response to a question that "Meg Whitman could be described as 'a political whore.' Yes, that's an accurate statement."
Last week, the National Organization for Women and the PAC of the California NOW chapter took heat for their endorsement of state Attorney General Jerry Brown (D) over Meg Whitman (R) in the gubernatorial race in the wake of comments by a Brown aide that Whitman was a "whore." At the time, national NOW President Terry O'Neill said that anyone who "from here on" calls a woman a "whore" should be fired.
She might want to have a talk with California NOW President Parry Bellasalma, who today told TPM in response to a question that "Meg Whitman could be described as 'a political whore.' Yes, that's an accurate statement."
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/california-now-president-meg-whitman-could-be-described-as-a-political-whore
Two points
These are all in the first page AFTER the definition from Urban dictionary. They are in order of appearance in my google search. The search term was "political **^&(&" We cannot cannot use the actual word because it is magical. This is how language is evolving. You will see this horrible term used increasingly in politics. It matters little what you do, or how much you complaint.
Now, this does not mean I would necessarily use the term in a news article. But you would be shocked how many times I have heard it used to describe politicians on both sides of the aisle and genders, in the recent past. The usage has increased by orders of magnitude in the last two years. And I fear, from reading the entries on the google that we are late to the party in my little cul de sac, that aparently is not part of the country anyway.
As you can see, the NATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF WOMEN did go there and called Fiorina that. You have a fox personality who happens to be a woman and black use the term for a male. And Gawker used it for a K street firm run by two WHITE males.
Now I expect the outrage brigade to tell me how this is not real, never mind it is actually sourced. Fortunately I have a World Health Organization report to read... and there is no storm, so better take advantage of THAT! (Literally calm before the storm, by two we will see if Dolores once again becomes painful... yeah play on words... but you need to speak Spanish to get it I s'pose and I would not be good enough to explain that joke. After all what would a native speaker know?)
535 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
so, if someone calls Elizabeth Warren a "stupid whore' we should shrug our shoulders
geek tragedy
Jul 2015
#18
do a google image search for the word. tell us how women are depicted in the results
geek tragedy
Jul 2015
#25
sure, new meaning doesn't mean primary or mainstream meaning, or that the new
geek tragedy
Jul 2015
#47
do you not understand the difference between reporting on the use of a word
geek tragedy
Jul 2015
#59
a "stupid whore" would be the wrong usage, the one that should be avoided.
Warren Stupidity
Jul 2015
#140
well, apparently at DU it's okay to call Hillary a straight up "whore" so that nuance
geek tragedy
Jul 2015
#144
I actually left DU a couple of years ago because I was so sick of the word policing
hifiguy
Jul 2015
#347
Glad you came back to tell us how much you hate it at this "cesspool" as you called it.
zappaman
Jul 2015
#359
One could make the case that sexist and racist words "internalize" rather than "evolve."
ancianita
Jul 2015
#185
My god, do you even know a thing about the origin of the word? Serious
nadinbrzezinski
Jul 2015
#196
I like the word. I love etymology. I'm an anti-censorship English teacher. Here, given the site's
ancianita
Jul 2015
#197
I get that and am here to tell you I've never been one of that group. I don't support them, even
ancianita
Jul 2015
#199
Then why are people mad at the word? In the 2 most recent cases where I've seen it used it was
craigmatic
Jul 2015
#8
Silent Victory, a book by Clay Blair, gives an account of the HOR engines...
Eleanors38
Jul 2015
#450
How is using a word meaning "selling oneself for money" to describe "selling oneself for money"
NuclearDem
Jul 2015
#9
If enough people say it is offensive, then there should be no problem with not using it.
randome
Jul 2015
#22
No. You should be polite and make your points intelligently. No one said you need to scold anyone.
randome
Jul 2015
#35
Maybe you missed the conversations. We've discussed it. It's a bonehead move to call a woman a
MADem
Jul 2015
#64
No you aren't--your goal was to make the casual skimmer think that I wrote that shit,
MADem
Jul 2015
#93
Yes it is. This isn't a discussion, though. There's only one non-misogynist view on this topic
MADem
Jul 2015
#306
No, it's not. Calling women whores is wrong. And I have no desire to "amuse" YOU. nt
MADem
Jul 2015
#308
I am not insisting on anything. Calling women whores IS wrong. No "insisting" needed.
MADem
Jul 2015
#311
I don't hate the language, but I have no respect for those who play cutesy games with it.
MADem
Jul 2015
#328
Yeah, that's why you wrote an OP on it. And you've written hundreds of posts to keep your little
MADem
Jul 2015
#391
You aren't the NYT or CNN. You are an anonymous poster on the internet writing bad words for shock
MADem
Jul 2015
#397
It's not "sweet crow" when you rudely refuse to provide the links in the first place.
MADem
Jul 2015
#402
Your links are saying the WORD IS BAD. Your thesis is not that. You argued "evolution" --these
MADem
Jul 2015
#408
No "progress." You had to delete your ugly, hateful post where you actually figured
MADem
Jul 2015
#412
You are pushing your own buttons, by repeatedly asking the same question, over and over and over
MADem
Jul 2015
#440
And THAT's why you quickly deleted it and offered a halfassed apology wrapped in insults. Yep!
MADem
Jul 2015
#470
Awww, look at YOU! You called me a LOONY with a bit of "classic comedy" and now--after you
MADem
Jul 2015
#474
Nah did not call you a loonie, but told you would be able to find the word easily, analogy
nadinbrzezinski
Jul 2015
#476
No one is trying to "read your mind." Paranoid, much? She summarized your very words.
MADem
Jul 2015
#495
Only they aren't "personal attacks." But there you go, "mischaracterizing" yet again.
MADem
Jul 2015
#509
I am sorry you feel that is a lecture, but trust me, that is your issue
nadinbrzezinski
Jul 2015
#523
Below, not bellow. And you are anonymous to me, and you didn't provide links to prove your claims.
MADem
Jul 2015
#400
You don't apparently know what "bully" means either. You are shopping serious errors of fact.
MADem
Jul 2015
#403
Now you're calling me a LOONY for pointing out that you made up that stuff about those
MADem
Jul 2015
#406
You called me a loony and that's a direct personal insult. Further, you didn't tell the truth about
MADem
Jul 2015
#409
You apologized? More like you realized you stepped way the fuck over the line, as you do. nt
MADem
Jul 2015
#413
Thank you so much for that succinct deconstruction! You held the mirror up beautifully. nt
MADem
Jul 2015
#423
Well some here have done their best to derail it, that's abundantly clear! nt
haikugal
Jul 2015
#421
You are CALLING OUT individual DUers who are not participating in this thread with those links.
MADem
Jul 2015
#94
You found a few examples from WAAAAAY back in DU2--and you're calling that "liberally used?"
MADem
Jul 2015
#161
Hillary supporters seemed to find ONE case of a 160-post-count newbie using the word in the OP and
AtheistCrusader
Jul 2015
#164
And I'm sure if Mrs. Sanders were called that vile word from a "160 post count newbie" the
MADem
Jul 2015
#166
You'll be the one using it, then--I don't think anyone who doesn't support him as their first choice
MADem
Jul 2015
#171
If you really do "cringe" at it, then why are you endorsing the use of it in this thread?
MADem
Jul 2015
#221
Let me stop you right at your bullshit subject line. Nowhere have I "endorsed it". Try again.
AtheistCrusader
Jul 2015
#224
It's not bullshit--everyone can read what you've written here--your words endorse--you don't have
MADem
Jul 2015
#226
I said I would ban. I said I alerted. (I did) If you can't understand that, then yes, let this
AtheistCrusader
Jul 2015
#232
When you don't -- clearly -- read the words on the post, that is not an untoward inference to make.
MADem
Jul 2015
#261
You are the person affecting a dislike for a word while cheerleading a thesis that takes the
MADem
Jul 2015
#266
Go ahead and alert on it--I am simply pointing out that you rec your own thread--
MADem
Jul 2015
#295
I missed the part where Public Person and Politician became interchangeable terms.
AtheistCrusader
Jul 2015
#217
No, you seem determined to energetically misunderstand everything I say.
AtheistCrusader
Jul 2015
#228
I don't "seem" to be doing anything of the sort. Look, your words speak for you.
MADem
Jul 2015
#230
No, 'My Words' don't speak for me anymore after you've regurgitated them back through your misunders
AtheistCrusader
Jul 2015
#233
I expect people to go to the source -- so give that "regurgitated" nonsense a rest.
MADem
Jul 2015
#253
Personally I would have banned that user with a 'lurk more' message, but i'm not going to make a
AtheistCrusader
Jul 2015
#237
So, you approve of calling out DUers for words they said years ago, when they aren't
MADem
Jul 2015
#157
You are not "all for changing the discourse." Your words in this thread belie that assertion.
MADem
Jul 2015
#251
I am cordial with the OP, because I read and understood the original post.
AtheistCrusader
Jul 2015
#257
All I can say is this--you appear, to me, to be playing both sides of the street.
MADem
Jul 2015
#274
Obviously NOW is a rightwing, anti-feminist, group that wants to insult women. K&R
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jul 2015
#56
Sad that your standards of what's socially acceptable or not are locked centuries in the past.
NuclearDem
Jul 2015
#115
Do you think that other writers, modern writers, avoid the evil word?
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jul 2015
#139
I've read Steinbeck and Hemingway. I learned much from Steinbeck and Hemingway.
randome
Jul 2015
#151
I share your view. Basic spelling and grammar are not optional elements of even marginal writing. nt
MADem
Jul 2015
#229
As soon as it makes it's undeniable appearance I am gone... not a threat, a promise.
nadinbrzezinski
Jul 2015
#106
There is no question in my view that the meaning of "W" changed after George W Bush was president
still_one
Jul 2015
#79
I guess you are into personal attacks instead of noticing that three of the people
nadinbrzezinski
Jul 2015
#134
"Word Evolutionists" would not be insulted by this, but rather it would become a
misterhighwasted
Jul 2015
#142
How is this nadin's "umpteenth op supporting calling women whores"? Links please.
kath
Jul 2015
#190
FAIL. You said this is nadin's "umpteenth op supporting calling women whore". NONE of your links are
kath
Jul 2015
#281
NO. of all the links, that is one of the very few (if not the only one)that was actually an*OP*,
kath
Jul 2015
#310
Wrong, the victim who is now finding the bullies rip roaring hilarious
nadinbrzezinski
Jul 2015
#468
Well I expect the clutch their pearls brigade to continue to fight a losing battle
nadinbrzezinski
Jul 2015
#175
Using that word would require you--if you weren't trying to "secret snark" -- to have confidence
MADem
Jul 2015
#272
for a writer, historian, reporter, mega-expert at everything, and gigantic intellect
Kali
Jul 2015
#484
That's right. Based on your posting history, I've come to a conclusion. And you surmised it
MADem
Jul 2015
#249
There's nothing more to say. Go re-read what I wrote, if you didn't get it the first time. nt
MADem
Jul 2015
#276
Does this mean I can't call Scott Walker or Chris Christie "Koch Whores"?
backscatter712
Jul 2015
#348
Should I point to other folks self deleting threads? Are you going to go harrass them too?
nadinbrzezinski
Jul 2015
#478
Hysteria is a great example of word evolution. It once refereed to a condition that affected women
Agnosticsherbet
Jul 2015
#499