Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: History of the use of the word "whore" on DU [View all]CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)196. I don't think that it is good idea to call Democratic candidate....
derogatory names, whether those names have a sexual connotations or not. Regardless of which of the Democratic candidates wins, he/she will be a lot better choice than any one of the current crowd Republicans candidates. Long gone are the days when the Republican Party presented viable alternatives.
So unless you plan to vote for a Republican come November of 2016, it is not wise to try to belittle the person who might be your ultimate choice for President. On the other hand, if you intend to sit the election out if your choice for the Democratic nominee doesn't win the nomination, it doesn't matter what you think because you would not be bright enough to vote in your selfish self interest.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
207 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Indeed - the post in question (from this morning) had no modifying adjective....
George II
Jul 2015
#34
Like the contextual difference of calling a woman a whore and calling a man or institution one.
Gormy Cuss
Jul 2015
#43
It has a clearly nonsexual meaning in one usage now, namely doing anything for money.
Gormy Cuss
Jul 2015
#161
When it's become one of the accepted meanings of the word it's no longer just metaphorical.
Gormy Cuss
Jul 2015
#179
Unless the woman is in the sex industry, calling a woman a WHORE is sexist hate speech.
MADem
Jul 2015
#69
No, it isn't "OK" but it stands up to scrutiny as a descriptor, insulting as it might be.
MADem
Jul 2015
#141
"They" I read the post and looked to see if I recognized the name. Did not. But what I did see was
jwirr
Jul 2015
#47
Meta prohibitions only apply to the thread - starting post. We can get as Meta as we wanna be
MADem
Jul 2015
#130
Rationalizing is everything. In this case, context is simply a pretty box we place our rationalizati
LanternWaste
Jul 2015
#193
Absolutely! But it reflects so poorly on Bernie supporters in general that I am suprised...
Walk away
Jul 2015
#46
What are we to do? The poster had 160 posts and I for one do not remember seeing any of these
jwirr
Jul 2015
#52
Henry was a rescued Cairn Terrier but I always thought he had Westie in there too.....
Walk away
Jul 2015
#98
I am a Bernie supporter who was among all those arguing against the word's use, which, by
ancianita
Jul 2015
#204
I'm sure you're bringing this up now because of the furor over a post early this morning....
George II
Jul 2015
#16
Can we not discuss the use of this word, in its various CONTEXTS, without getting all
kath
Jul 2015
#18
Would you be offended if, because of this OP, I called you (obviously not meaning it so DON'T.....
George II
Jul 2015
#23
After this the name Bernie Sanders actually makes me sick. You people have finally...
Walk away
Jul 2015
#51
Because of a 160 post idiot? Are you sure he/she is a supporter of Bernie? The trolls come to DU
jwirr
Jul 2015
#55
Yes, I do not know for sure who the poster was - as I said I did not recognize the name. But when
jwirr
Jul 2015
#75
I guess the threads filled with Bernie supporters defending the use of the word....
Walk away
Jul 2015
#81
You have no idea what I think... I would have voted to hide. Nice try, though. n/t
demmiblue
Jul 2015
#84
It's refreshing to hear of a Bernie supporter who it's so blinded by their...
Walk away
Jul 2015
#91
Please, my mother brought me into the voting booth when she cast her vote for JFK...
Walk away
Jul 2015
#158
Here is you calling a woman a whore on DU. How can that be? It's like, hypocrisy almost!!!!
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2016
#206
So it is misogynist even when it is applied to male politicians, male media figures and male
kath
Jul 2015
#44
Okay. Thought provoking. Perhaps "whore" should not be used at DU, but "sellout" or "shill" used
kath
Jul 2015
#70
I have used the word whore when referring to politicians who give every appearance
guillaumeb
Jul 2015
#60
So, if I called Sanders a whore for the gun industry, that would be ok with you?
OKNancy
Jul 2015
#61
So - the general consensus is that posts containing the word "whore" should always be hidden
kath
Jul 2015
#62
Bullshit. I'm a Bernie supporter on the jury who's been arguing against the use of that word.
ancianita
Jul 2015
#107
The folks who ran that website were not misogynists and would not approve of folks calling Hillary
stevenleser
Jul 2015
#93
That post gives some context for what started the current argument
muriel_volestrangler
Jul 2015
#95
If the "media whores" they were talking about were FEMALE broadcasters, you'd have a problem with it
MADem
Jul 2015
#134
It's not "just" a sexual term. But one does not have to be a weatherman to know which way the wind
MADem
Jul 2015
#181
Censorship? Is this the most important issue you can think of that needs to be dvocated for?
notadmblnd
Jul 2015
#106
Toxic language in the name of the 1st Amendment creates toxic environments for campaigns.
ancianita
Jul 2015
#113
A toxic language environment in politics is downright indecent. Don't pretend otherwise.
ancianita
Jul 2015
#117
This political website by adults who don't use childish talk. I advocate suspension, not censorship.
ancianita
Jul 2015
#190
I did presume to tell the poster that not clarifying what he meant left his words interpretable
ancianita
Jul 2015
#198
Don't twist what I said into "promote all the free use of language." I am against censorship
notadmblnd
Jul 2015
#199
As a juror I'll say you're welcome. I have a daily 99% chance of being on one for a reason.
ancianita
Jul 2015
#200
No one resurrected "nigger" when Obama ran, and no one's using "whore" while Clinton runs.
ancianita
Jul 2015
#108
in the case of this video, it was the center of the issue, and should probably be allowed
tomm2thumbs
Jul 2015
#133
You can call a woman anything you want... it helps point out who is on the wrong side
TerrapinFlyer
Jul 2015
#138
Calling a woman a whore is something you should have learned was wrong by age four.
KMOD
Jul 2015
#142
How the fuck is this thread not META? I've had similar ones locked when trying to discuss why a
boston bean
Jul 2015
#150
point me to some others that were gravedancing. You're good with the search button.
boston bean
Jul 2015
#167
SKP was banned. My thread was a positive thread regarding the actions taken.
boston bean
Jul 2015
#175
Ok, but those that use them words in the context of misogynistic/sexist/racist/homophobic
boston bean
Jul 2015
#154
It would certainly cut down on the usage and make this place feel much more welcoming
boston bean
Jul 2015
#157
We certainly do try to rationalize our dramatic lack of empathy in odd little ways...
LanternWaste
Jul 2015
#192