Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

AOR

(692 posts)
31. A different view...
Mon Jul 20, 2015, 10:31 PM
Jul 2015

Zombie Apocalypse and the Politics of Artificial Scarcity
by Colin Jenkins

Capitalism and Artificial Scarcity

“In order for capitalism to survive, scarcity must exist, even if through artificial means.”

(Snip)

"It is no secret that capitalism thrives off exploitation. It needs a large majority of people to be completely reliant on their labor power. It needs private property to be accessible to only a few, so that they may utilize it as a social relationship where the rented majority can labor and create value. It needs capital to be accessible to only a few, so that they may regenerate and reinvest said capital in a perpetual manner. And it needs a considerable population of the impoverished and unemployed – "a reserve army of labor," as Marx put it – in order to create a "demand" for labor and thus make such exploitative positions "competitive" to those who need to partake in them to merely survive. It needs these things in order to stay intact – something that is desirable to the 85 richest people in the world who own more than half of the world's entire population (3.6 billion people)."

(Snip)

" But wealth accumulation through alienation and exploitation is not enough in itself. The system also needs to create scarcity where it does not already exist. Even Marx admitted that capitalism has given us the productive capacity to provide all that is needed for the global population. In other words, capitalism has proven that scarcity does not exist. And, over the years, technology has confirmed this. But, in order for capitalism to survive, scarcity must exist, even if through artificial means. This is a necessary component on multiple fronts, including the pricing of commodities, the enhancement of wealth, and the need to inject a high degree of competition among people (who are naturally inclined to cooperation).

Since capitalism is based in the buying and selling of commodities, its lifeblood is production. And since production in a capitalist system is not based on need, but rather on demand, it has the tendency to produce more than it can sell. This is called overproduction"

(Snip)

" When overproduction occurs, it must be addressed. There are multiple ways to do this. Marx addressed three options: "On the one hand by enforced destruction of a mass of productive forces; on the other, by the conquest of new markets, and by the more thorough exploitation of the old ones." Another is through the destruction of excess capital and commodities. Whichever measure is taken, it is paramount that the economy must emerge from a starting point that is different from the ending point where the crisis began. This is accomplished through creating scarcity, whether in regards to labor, production capacity, or commodities and basic needs.

Maintaining scarcity is also necessary for wealth enhancement. It is not enough that accumulation flows to a very small section of the population, but more so that a considerable portion of the population is faced with the inherent struggles related to inaccessibility. For example, if millions of people are unable to access basic needs such as food, clothing, shelter, and healthcare, the commodification of those needs becomes all the more effective. On the flip side, the mere presence of accessibility – or wealth – which is enjoyed by the elite becomes all the more valuable because it is highly sought after. "

(Snip)

"In this sense, it is not the accumulation of personal wealth that creates advantageous positions on the socioeconomic ladder; it's the impoverishment of the majority. Allowing human beings access to basic necessities would essentially destroy the allure (and thus, power) of wealth and the coercive nature of forced participation. This effect is maintained through artificial scarcity – the coordinated withholding of basic needs from the majority. These measures also seek to create a predatory landscape – something akin to a post-apocalyptic, zombie-filled world where manufactured scarcity pits poor against poor and worker against worker, all the while pulling attention away from the zombie threat. "

Full article at link...


http://www.blackagendareport.com/node/14600

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I get my planet advice from that eminent scientist, George Carlin msongs Jul 2015 #1
'The planet isn't going anywhere... We are!' onehandle Jul 2015 #9
Sea level rise of at least several meters in as little as 50 years. Ha ha. Octafish Jul 2015 #2
The wealthy don't undersatnd that they are building their own prison. jalan48 Jul 2015 #14
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jul 2015 #3
We are the frog in the pot of water, "It's just a little hotter. It's just a little hotter...." pampango Jul 2015 #4
K & R n/t xocet Jul 2015 #5
Could be headed? It's WHERE we're headed pscot Jul 2015 #6
KNR. DirkGently Jul 2015 #7
If only we would listen to our prophets locks Jul 2015 #8
"before it's too late to change our ways" GliderGuider Jul 2015 #10
If only we would get serious about human overpopulation. BlancheSplanchnik Jul 2015 #11
Overpopulation is not the problem... AOR Jul 2015 #13
well said. n/t. airplaneman Jul 2015 #18
There are no victims. Xithras Jul 2015 #19
No victims ? AOR Jul 2015 #23
It's not a one or the other choice Xithras Jul 2015 #24
The planet will survive until it doesn't... AOR Jul 2015 #25
I would say you're too hung up on capitalism as some singular evil The2ndWheel Jul 2015 #30
I agree that it is not a choice but i see it more a chance and a change nolabels Jul 2015 #39
no, we have too many humans as well- It's not just 1 problem snooper2 Jul 2015 #20
Red-baiting with North Korea is not helpful... AOR Jul 2015 #27
red baiting? snooper2 Jul 2015 #38
How is that Red-baiting? Adrahil Jul 2015 #40
It's both overpopulation and the consumer society. Enthusiast Jul 2015 #22
You're promoting a myth BlancheSplanchnik Jul 2015 #28
Malthus and population bomb theories have been completely debunked... AOR Jul 2015 #32
War is one big way we depopulate. BlancheSplanchnik Jul 2015 #34
The problem is infinite growth on a finite planet. Alittleliberal Jul 2015 #29
A different view... AOR Jul 2015 #31
Link doesn't work, but I presume it's this: muriel_volestrangler Jul 2015 #41
there foxface666 Jul 2015 #36
More people mean more production and resources used. progressoid Jul 2015 #43
Not the problem??? Duppers Jul 2015 #44
when TV shows about people who cannot stop breeding are popular Skittles Jul 2015 #26
Seriously. Babies mean biiiiig profits. BlancheSplanchnik Jul 2015 #33
america foxface666 Jul 2015 #35
don't factor in the Duggars, whatever you do Skittles Jul 2015 #37
If you don't believe in climate change, don't worry Shankapotomus Jul 2015 #12
LMAO nadinbrzezinski Jul 2015 #15
We will be lucky if his... deathrind Jul 2015 #16
And meanwhile... Spider Jerusalem Jul 2015 #17
Short term beats long term The2ndWheel Jul 2015 #42
So, the housing market is doing pretty good now, why aren't people moving from the coasts snooper2 Jul 2015 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The world’s most famous c...»Reply #31