General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: It was racial profiling. Sandra Bland made that lane change to let the cop who was tailing her pass. [View all]Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)When cops are working a traffic detail on a specific stretch of road it's pretty typical to turn around and go the other way after each stop- that way you stay in the area you wish to work.
He followed her for less than 30 seconds before she made the lane change- not long at all.
None of that is indicative of any form of profiling.
In fact, it appears as if he intends to only issue her a warning when he goes back up to the car. Profiling just to give warnings? Doesn't really add up.
Then the author makes several claims showing an ignorance of the law- no, she didn't have a "right" to smoke while being legally detained in a traffic stop. No, she does not have a "right" to demand he explain why he is telling her to exit the vehicle before she has to comply. It's people spreading bad legal advice like this that cause people who think it's true that cause others, acting in good faith thinking they are right, to make bad decisions that turn something minor into something worse.
This whole article is a combination of ignorance of the law posing as someone with knowledge, broad assumptions and conjecture with no basis in fact behind it. The author is determined for every aspect to be racism no matter what, so he twists logic as far as possible. We are better than that kind of distortion.