Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

jeff47

(26,549 posts)

18. Adding the qualifier and then writing as if it is not present

Reply to Lee-Lee (Reply #16)

Wed Jul 22, 2015, 01:32 PM

Jul 2015

demonstrates you're not really believing the qualifier.

You make a stop going one way, then make a u-turn when done to patrol the other way, make a u-turn at the end of the assigned area if you don't make a stop or if you do make a stop make a u-turn at the end of it and repeat again.

Except the video shows that wasn't what happened. He made a U-turn and pursued this car. And did so at a speed where there was no way he could enforce traffic laws like speeding.

Nothing illegal or incorrect in that procedure at all.

Sure! That's why he's been assigned to desk duty for violating procedure. Because there was nothing incorrect in anything he did.

Though I am quite excited about the new physics we will discover from the temporal distortions on the dashcam video.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

24 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

State trooper who arrested Sandra Bland is �the Donald Trump of traffic cops,� pastor says [View all] DonViejo Jul 2015 OP

I'm sure that pastor means well, but to me that is trivializing cwydro Jul 2015 #1

And by spreading bad info about what ones rights are during a stop Lee-Lee Jul 2015 #2

Bullshit! BillZBubb Jul 2015 #4

You need to read Rodriguez vs United States. KitSileya Jul 2015 #6

No, that doesn't come close to the standard in Rodriuez Lee-Lee Jul 2015 #7

I disagree, but since Bland is dead, we will never see her nail this cop in court. KitSileya Jul 2015 #14

There are laws... Ino Jul 2015 #22

No, your rights to not disappear when a police officer tells you to do something. jeff47 Jul 2015 #8

I've posted several times before why I never allowed anyone to smoke. Lee-Lee Jul 2015 #9

Then why did the cop wait until late in the stop to demand she stop smoking? jeff47 Jul 2015 #10

Do we even know that she was smoking then? Lee-Lee Jul 2015 #11

Do we even know she wasn't smoking then? jeff47 Jul 2015 #12

Innocence from what? Your making shit up Lee-Lee Jul 2015 #13

Making shit up like "she must have lit the cigarette" when you have zero evidence she did? jeff47 Jul 2015 #15

Go back and read Lee-Lee Jul 2015 #16

Adding the qualifier and then writing as if it is not present jeff47 Jul 2015 #18

The presumption was yours. lumberjack_jeff Jul 2015 #20

Yes, rights evaporate when a police officer tells you to do something. jeff47 Jul 2015 #21

There are some requests that I don't have a right to refuse. lumberjack_jeff Jul 2015 #24

Thank you libodem Jul 2015 #3

Trump is a buffoon. That cop is something much worse. BillZBubb Jul 2015 #5

He went over the cliff before Bland refused his order to put out a cigarette. Snotcicles Jul 2015 #17

From what I've heard the method of pulling up behind motorists quickly, is to get them to Snotcicles Jul 2015 #19

^^^ this, exactly ^^^ (nt) Ino Jul 2015 #23