Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)

6. Yes because US "terms" are so favorable

Reply to Zorro (Original post)

Wed Jul 22, 2015, 11:25 PM

Jul 2015

Saxby Chambliss says Snowden should "hang" for his "crimes" without due process...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141151783

So a Senator who was the Vice Chancellor on the Senate Committee for Intelligence says you should hang before any due process and you think Snowden should just come home without conditions!?

This is proof positive why Snowden was wise to run asap after his disclosures. There's no "justice" here.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

NSA leaker Edward Snowden seeks return to U.S., on his terms [View all] Zorro Jul 2015 OP

This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Jul 2015 #1

"good faith" with someone like Edward Snowden? Huh? nt kelliekat44 Jul 2015 #3

+1 truebluegreen Jul 2015 #7

Wow. That's just what Senator Tom Cotton said. randome Jul 2015 #11

So what if they don't want him.... Historic NY Jul 2015 #2

Shame on the LA Times for an editorilal headline. elias49 Jul 2015 #4

On his terms? I love clickbait headlines!!! MADem Jul 2015 #5

"64% of respondents familiar with Snowden said they held a negative view of him. " Tarheel_Dem Jul 2015 #8

Yes--and we can be certain that everything he had on him, the Russians got MADem Jul 2015 #10

Yup. Seems like the more awards he picked up abroad, the more his negatives rose at home. Tarheel_Dem Jul 2015 #14

Yes because US "terms" are so favorable riderinthestorm Jul 2015 #6

He should be charged. But I am okay with leniency in sentencing if (and likely when) found guilty. phleshdef Jul 2015 #9

This story seem to be mostly empty babble. bemildred Jul 2015 #12

Because the media is trying to recapture the 'glory' days of Snowden's escapades. randome Jul 2015 #15

He is not a "whistleblower" treestar Jul 2015 #13